Difference between revisions of "2007 AIME I Problems/Problem 14"
Tigershark22 (talk | contribs) (→Solution: fix for real this time) |
(Add a solution to a more elementary and rigorous solution to a slightly generalized version.) |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
The sequence certainly grows fast enough such that <math>\frac{2007}{a_{2005}a_{2006}}<1</math>. Therefore, the largest integer less than or equal to this value is <math>224</math>. | The sequence certainly grows fast enough such that <math>\frac{2007}{a_{2005}a_{2006}}<1</math>. Therefore, the largest integer less than or equal to this value is <math>224</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Solution 3 ( generalized )=== | ||
+ | This is a more elementary and rigorous solution to a slightly generalized version. The defining recursive sequence is generalized to | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | a_{n+1}a_{n-1} = a_n^2 + 9k, ---------(1) | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | where <math> k </math> is a positive integer and <math> a_0 = a_1 = 3. </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lemma 1 : For <math>n \geq 1</math>, | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | a_{n+1} = ( k + 2)a_n - a_{n-1}. ---------(2) | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | We shall prove by induction. From (1), <math> a_2 = 3k + 3 </math>. From the lemma, <math>a_2 = (k + 2) 3 - 3 = 3k + 3.</math> Base case proven. Assume that the lemma is true for some <math> t \geq 1 </math>. Then, eliminating the <math>a_{t-1}</math> using (1) and (2) gives | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | (k+2)a_ta_{t+1} = a_t^2 + a_{t+1}^2 + 9k. ---------(3) | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | It follows from (2) that | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | (k+2)a_{t+1} - a_t =\frac{(k+2)a_{t+1}a_t - a_t^2}{a_t} =\frac{a_{t+1}^2 + 9k}{a_t} =a_{t+2}, | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | where the last line followed from (1) for case <math> n = t+1 </math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lemma 2 : For <math>n \geq 0,</math> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | a_{n+1} \geq a_{n}. | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | Base case is obvious. Assume that <math>a_{t+1} \geq a_{t}</math> for some <math>t \geq 0</math>. Then it follows that | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | a_{t+2} =\frac{a_{t+1}^2 + 9k}{a_t} = a_{t+1}(\frac{a_{t+1}}{a_t} ) + 9k \geq a_{t+1} + 9k > a_{t+1}. | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This completes the induction. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lemma 3 : For <math>n \geq 1,</math> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | a_n a_{n+1} > 9k | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using (1) and Lemma 2, for <math>n \geq 1,</math> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | a_{n+1}a_n \geq a_{n+1}a_{n-1} = a_n^2 + 9k > 9k | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, using (3), for <math>n \geq 1, </math> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \frac{a_n^2 + a_{n+1}^2}{a_n a_{n+1}} =\frac{(k+2)a_n a_{n+1} - 9k}{a_n a_{n+1}} = k+2 -\frac{9k}{a_n a_{n+1}}. | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | Using lemma 3, the largest integer less than or equal to this value would be <math>k + 1</math>. | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 10:51, 14 December 2016
Problem
A sequence is defined over non-negative integral indexes in the following way: , .
Find the greatest integer that does not exceed
Solution 1
We are given that
, .
Add these two equations to get
- .
This is an invariant. Defining for each , the above equation means
.
We can thus calculate that . Now notice that . This means that
. It is only a tiny bit less because all the are greater than , so we conclude that the floor of is .
Solution 2
The equation looks like the determinant Therefore, the determinant of this matrix is invariant. Guessing that this sequence might be a linear recursion because of the matrix form given below, we define the sequence defined by and for . We wish to find and such that for all . To do this, we use the following matrix form of a linear recurrence relation
When we take determinants, this equation becomes
We want for all . Therefore, we replace the two matrices by to find that
Therefore, . Computing that , and using the fact that , we conclude that . Clearly, , , and . We claim that for all . We proceed by induction. If for all , then clearly, We also know by the definition of that
We know that the RHS is by previous work. Therefore, . After substuting in the values we know, this becomes . Thinking of this as a linear equation in the variable , we already know that this has the solution . Therefore, by induction, for all . We conclude that satisfies the linear recurrence .
It's easy to prove that is a strictly increasing sequence of integers for . Now
The sequence certainly grows fast enough such that . Therefore, the largest integer less than or equal to this value is .
Solution 3 ( generalized )
This is a more elementary and rigorous solution to a slightly generalized version. The defining recursive sequence is generalized to
where is a positive integer and
Lemma 1 : For , We shall prove by induction. From (1), . From the lemma, Base case proven. Assume that the lemma is true for some . Then, eliminating the using (1) and (2) gives
It follows from (2) that
where the last line followed from (1) for case .
Lemma 2 : For Base case is obvious. Assume that for some . Then it follows that
This completes the induction.
Lemma 3 : For
Using (1) and Lemma 2, for
Finally, using (3), for Using lemma 3, the largest integer less than or equal to this value would be .
See also
2007 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 13 |
Followed by Problem 15 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.