Difference between revisions of "Talk:Power set"

Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Really?  Where can I find a proof?  Thanks. —[[User:Boy Soprano II|Boy Soprano II]] 21:53, 26 August 2006 (EDT)
 
Really?  Where can I find a proof?  Thanks. —[[User:Boy Soprano II|Boy Soprano II]] 21:53, 26 August 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
See the bottom of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor%27s_diagonal_argument --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 01:25, 27 August 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:25, 27 August 2006

I deleted the part that said that for no infinite set was there a bijection between the set and its power set. I am fairly certain that this is undecided. It certainly is known that the proposition $\displaystyle 2^{\aleph _{n} } = \aleph _{ n+1 }$ is undecidable, so I am very suspicious of a proposition that such a cardinality as $\displaystyle \aleph _{n>1}$ exists at all. Or are these cardinalities known to exist after all? If so, how are they defined? —Boy Soprano II 21:35, 26 August 2006 (EDT)

It is true (and decidable) that there is no bijection between a set and its power set. --ComplexZeta 21:45, 26 August 2006 (EDT)

Really? Where can I find a proof? Thanks. —Boy Soprano II 21:53, 26 August 2006 (EDT)

See the bottom of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor%27s_diagonal_argument --ComplexZeta 01:25, 27 August 2006 (EDT)