2002 OIM Problems/Problem 3

Revision as of 15:31, 13 December 2023 by Tomasdiaz (talk | contribs)

Problem

Pablo was copying the following problem:

\[\text{Consider all sequences of 2004 real numbers}(x_0,x_1,x_2,\cdots , x_{2003})\text{, such that}\]

\[x_0=1\text{,}\]

\[0\le x_1 \le 2x_0 \text{,}\]

\[0\le x_2 \le 2x_1 \text{,}\]

\[\vdots\]

\[0\le x_{2003} \le 2x_{2004} \text{.}\]

\[\text{Among all these sequences, find the one for which the following expression takes its largest value: S = ...}.\]

When Pablo was going to copy the expression for $S$, they erased the blackboard. The only thing he could remember was that $S$ was of the form

\[S=\pm x_1\pm x_2\pm \cdots\pm x_{2002}+x_{2003}\]

where the last term, $x_{2003}$, had a coefficient +1, and the previous ones had a coefficient +1 or -1. Show that Paul, despite not having the complete statement, can find with certainty the solution to the problem.

~translated into English by Tomas Diaz. ~orders@tomasdiaz.com

Solution

This problem needs a solution. If you have a solution for it, please help us out by adding it.

See also

https://www.oma.org.ar/enunciados/ibe18.htm