1963 IMO Problems/Problem 6

Problem

Five students, $A,B,C,D,E$ , took part in a contest. One prediction was that the contestants would finish in the order $ABCDE$ . This prediction was very poor. In fact no contestant finished in the position predicted, and no two contestants predicted to finish consecutively actually did so. A second prediction had the contestants finishing in the order $DAECB$ . This prediction was better. Exactly two of the contestants finished in the places predicted, and two disjoint pairs of students predicted to finish consecutively actually did so. Determine the order in which the contestants finished.

Solution

This problem needs a solution. If you have a solution for it, please help us out by adding it. We are given that no contestant finished in the position predicted, and no two contestants predicted to finish consecutively actually did so in $ABCDE$ . Also their actual positions we not $DAECB$ . After imposing these two conditions the list of possible outcomes is: (1) $CAEBD$ (2) $DCAEB$ (3) $DCEBA$ (4) $EDACB$ . One more condition is that two disjoint pairs of students predicted to finish consecutively actually did so. Out of the above four in the list, (1) and (2) have $AE$ as the correctly predicted consecutive finishers(but only 1 pair), (3) has no correctly predicted consecutive finishers. But (4) has 2 disjoint correctly predicted consecutive finishers who are $DA$ and $CB$ . Hence, order is $EDACB$ .

1963 IMO (Problems) • Resources
Preceded by Problem 5	1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6	Followed by Last Question
All IMO Problems and Solutions

Page

Toolbox

Search

1963 IMO Problems/Problem 6

Problem

Solution

See Also