Power set

Revision as of 20:34, 25 January 2008 by Temperal (talk | contribs) (expand lead)

The power set of a given set $S$ is the set $\mathcal{P}(S)$ of all subsets of that set This is denoted, other than by the common $\math{P}(S)$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg), by $2^{S}$$(which has to do with the number of elements in the power set of a given set).

==Examples== The [[empty set]] has only one subset, itself. Thus$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)\mathcal{P}(\emptyset) = \{\emptyset\}$.

A set$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)\{a\}$with a single element has two subsets, the empty set and the entire set.  Thus$\mathcal{P}(\{a\}) = \{\emptyset, \{a\}\}$.

A set$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)\{a, b\}$with two elements has four subsets, and$\mathcal{P}(\{a, b\}) = \{\emptyset, \{a\}, \{b\}, \{a, b\}\}$.

Similarly, for any [[finite]] set with$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)n$elements, the power set has$2^n$elements.

==Size Comparison== Note that for any [[nonnegative]] [[integer]]$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)n$,$2^n > n$and so for any finite set$S$,$|\mathcal P (S)| > |S|$(where [[absolute value]] signs here denote the [[cardinality]] of a set).  The analogous result is also true for [[infinite]] sets (and thus for all sets): for any set$S$, the cardinality$|\mathcal P (S)|$of the power set is strictly larger than the cardinality$|S|$of the set itself.

===Proof=== There is a natural [[injection]]$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)S \hookrightarrow \mathcal P (S)$taking$x \mapsto \{x\}$, so$|S| \leq |\mathcal P(S)|$.   Suppose for the sake of contradiction that$|S| = |\mathcal P(S)|$.  Then there is a [[bijection]]$f: \mathcal P(S) \to S$.  Let$T \subset S$be defined by$T = \{x \in S \;|\; x \not\in f(x) \}$.  Then$T \in \mathcal P(S)$and since$f$is a bijection,$\exists y\in S \;|\; T = f(y)$.

Now, note that$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)y \in T$by definition if and only if$y \not\in f(y)$, so$y \in T$if and only if$y \not \in T$.  This is a clear contradiction.  Thus the bijection$f$cannot really exist and$|\mathcal P (S)| \neq |S|$so$|\mathcal P(S)| > |S|$, as desired.


Note that this proof does not rely upon either the [[Continuum Hypothesis]] or the [[Axiom of Choice]]. It is a good example of a [[diagonal argument]], a method pioneered by the mathematician [[Georg Cantor]]. ==Size for Finite Sets==

The number of [[element|elements]] in a [[power set]] of a set with n elements is$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)2^n$for all finite sets. THis can be proven in a number of ways:

===Method 1===

Either an element in the power set can have 0 elements, one element, ... , or n elements. There are$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)\binom{n}{0}$ways to have no elements,$\binom{n}{1}$ways to have one element, ... , and$\binom{n}{n}$ways to have n elements. We add:$\binom{n}{0}+\binom{n}{1}+\cdots+\binom{n}{n}=2^n$as desired.

===Method 2===

We proceed with [[induction]].

Let S be the set with n elements. If n=0, then S is the empty set. Then$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)P(S)=\{\emptyset \}$and has$2^0=1$element.


Now let's say that the theorem stated above is true or n=k. We shall prove it for k+1.

Let's say that Q has k+1 elements.

In set Q, if we leave element x out, there will be$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)2^k$elements in the power set. Now we include the sets that do include x. But that's just$2^k$, since we are choosing either 0 1, ... or k elements to go with x. Therefore, if there are$2^k$elements in the power set of a set that has k elements, then there are$2^{k+1}$elements in the power set of a set that has k+1 elements.

Therefore, the number of elements in a power set of a set with n elements is$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)2^n$.

===Method 3===

We demonstrated in Method 2 that if S is the empty set, it works.

Now let's say that S has at least one element.

For an element x, it can be either in or out of a subset. Since there are n elements, and each different choice of in/out leads to a different subset, there are$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)2^n$ elements in the power sum.


See Also

External Links