2007 IMO Problems/Problem 5
Contents
Problem
(Kevin Buzzard and Edward Crane, United Kingdom) Let and be positive integers. Show that if divides , then .
Solution
Lemma. If there is a counterexample for some value of , then there is a counterexample for this value of such that .
Proof. Suppose that . Note that , but . It follows that . Since it follows that can be written as , with . Then is a counterexample for which .
Now, suppose a counterexample exists. Let be a counterexample for which is minimal and . We note that and Now, Thus is a counterexample. But , which contradicts the minimality of . Therefore no counterexample exists.
(Sean Yu, US)
Second Solution
As , since , we only need to show that . We will use the Vieta Jumping technique to solve it.
Suppose there exist counterexamples, which means the set is not empty. Then there exists a pair such that has the minimum sum among all pairs in . Without loss of generality, we assume . Let . Then is a positive integer and . So is a root for the quadratic equation . Using the Vieta Lemma, we know the equation has another root and from we know it is an integer. Note that since and , we have , which implies . Also , thus , and we get another pair , but , which contradicts the assumption that has the minimum sum.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
Resources
2007 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 6 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |
- <url>viewtopic.php?p=894656#p894656 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url>