1971 IMO Problems/Problem 4
Problem
All the faces of tetrahedron are acute-angled triangles. We consider all closed polygonal paths of the form defined as follows: is a point on edge distinct from and ; similarly, are interior points of edges , respectively. Prove:
(a) If , then among the polygonal paths, there is none of minimal length.
(b) If , then there are infinitely many shortest polygonal paths, their common length being , where .
Solution
Rotate the triangle around the edge until are in one plane. It is clear that in a shortest path, the point Y lies on the line connecting and . Therefore, . Summing the four equations like this, we get exactly .
Now, draw all four faces in the plane, so that is constructed on the exterior of the edge of and so on with edges and .
The final new edge (or rather ) is parallel to the original one (because of the angle equation). Call the direction on towards "right" and towards "left". If we choose a vertex on and connect it to the corresponding vertex on A'B'. This works for a whole interval of vertices if lies to the left of and and lies to the right of . It is not hard to see that these conditions correspond to the fact that various angles are acute by assumption.
Finally, regard the sine in half the isosceles triangle which gives the result with the angles around instead of , but the role of the vertices is symmetric.
Remarks (added by pf02, December 2024)
The solution above is incomplete and/or incorrect. The first part (which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best, since it is not clear how it leads to the result. (Very likely it is incorrect.) The second part, which claims to prove part (b) of the problem, skips too many steps. Some of the arguments in the proof (e.g. the fact that ) are true but need proof. I could not make any sense of other arguments in the proof, so I can not judge whether they are correct or not (I suspect not).
I will give a robust solution below. It goes along the same basic idea.
Solution 2
The basic idea is to "fold out" the tetrahedron into a polygon in the plane. The path becomes a collection of connected segments with the unconnected ends on the two line segments .
Specifically, we rotate the solid consisting of three faces around so is in the same plane as . Then we rotate the solid consisting of two faces around so that is in the same plane with the previous triangles. (We denoted the new "copy" of , since the original is being used in the picture.) Finally, we rotate around , so that it is in the same plane with the other triangles. (We denote the new "copy" of , and the new copy of .)
The polygonal path becomes . It is clear that in order to minimize , we should make be a segment on a straight line. Furthermore, to minimize the segment , we want to choose so that when we draw the line segment to its corresponding image , the length of is as short as possible.
This was the "folding out" done in the solution above. To continue, we will do a different "folding out", which will serve better for solving the problem. Specifically, we rotate around , then we rotate around to obtain , and finally, we rotate around to obtain . Now becomes . The polygonal path becomes going from to . We need to make this as small as possible, to find its minimum, if it exists.
The idea of the solution to the problem is now easy to explain. First of all, needs to be a segment on a straight line. Clearly has a lower bound (after all, it is ), so we can think about its lower limit. If there is a position of in which this lower limit is achieved, then this lower limit is a minimum. Otherwise, there is no minimum value for .
In the picture above, and are not parallel. The segment would be shortest when (and ). But this is not an acceptable position for , because the problem stated that is between and , not equal to any of them. So in this picture, there is no minimum for the polygonal path.
On the other hand, if (see pictures below) then there are lots of points yielding a minimum value for . Indeed, in this case , so the only requirement is for all the points to be inside the respective segments.
We will prove that if and only if . After this it will be easy to deduce all the statements of the problem.
[TO BE CONTINUED. SAVING MID WAY SO I DON"T LOSE WORK DONE SO FAR.]
See Also
1971 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |