Difference between revisions of "Exponentiation"
Revision as of 19:31, 23 June 2006
To understand exponents and the exponential function, let's first review how multiplication came about. Let's say we wanted to add 3 ten times. We could write this out as but this gets burdensome if we wanted to add, for example, 3 three hundred times. Thus, we define the multiplication function (usually denoted or ) such that where there are 300 threes in the sum. For integers, it is straightforward how multiplaction works. We can then extend the notion of multiplication to non-integers.
Similarly, the exponential function is defined as the repitition of multiplication. For example, writing out can get boring fast. So we define the exponential function to express this in a much more compact form so that the preceeding example can be written as (read 3 to the 5th or 3 to the 5 power). What this means is that we are multiplying 3 by itself 5 times.
Before we proceed, we define 3 terms:
- exponent or power - in the exponent is 6; this tells us how many times we multiply the 4
- base - in the base is 10; this tells us what we will be multiplying 9 times
Our definition of exponentiation makes sense if the exponent is a positive integer. How about negative integers such as ? How do we multiply 2 by itself -4 times!? Let's think about what a negative sign means a little more. When we append a negative sign to a number (say 4, for example) we are basically saying go four units in the opposite direction. So we want to do the opposite of multiplication four times. In other words, we want to divide by 2 four times. Therefore
It is also possible to extend the exponential function to all non-integers.
Listed below are some important properties of exponents:
- (if . is undefined.)
Here are explanations of the properties listed above:
- On both sides we are multiplying b together x+y times. Thus, they are equivalent.
- This is described in the previous section.
- This results from using the previous two properties.
- We are multiplying by itself y times which is the same as multiplying b by itself xy times.
- After multiplying ab by itself x times we can collect a and b terms thus establishing the property.
- Hoping that property #1 will be true when , we see that should (hopefully) be equal to . Thus, we define to be equal to in order to make this be true.
If is a number and each of and is a positive integer, then as explained above (property 1) . For example, .
How could we make sense of an expression like ""? Well, hoping that property 1 will remain true when , we see that should (hopefully) be equal to . For that reason, we define , in order to make that be true. (And we only make this definition in the case where . We choose to leave undefined.)
We can make sense of an expression like "" in a similar way. Hoping that property 1 will remain true even if or is negative, we see that should (hopefully) be equal to . Thus, we define to be , in order to make this be true. Similarly, if is a positive integer, we define to be . (This depends on having . Otherwise we'd be dividing by .)
How could we make sense of an expression like ? If you don't already know the answer, this is a good exercise; I recommend puzzling over it for awhile.
Answer: Hoping that property 1 will remain true when or is a fraction, we see that should (hopefully) be equal to . Thus, we define to be , in order to make this be true.
For the time being, how to deal with other fractions in the exponent can be an exercise for the reader.