KGS math club/solution pairing

Revision as of 19:55, 24 March 2016 by Gu1729 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===Main Statement=== For all even <math>n</math>, except for <math>2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 20</math> and <math>22</math>. ===Preparations=== Clearly, pairings are not possible for o...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Main Statement

For all even $n$, except for $2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 20$ and $22$.

Preparations

Clearly, pairings are not possible for odd $n$.

For numbers $a, b$, we say that $a$ is a partner of $b$, if $a + b$ is a perfect square.

The main statement is established through the following claims.

Claim (1) - The exceptional cases

No pairing is possible for the exceptions listed above.

Proof.

case $n = 2$:
The number $1$ does not have a partner.
case $n = 4$:
The number $4$ does not have a partner.
case $n = 6$:
The only partner for $1$ is $3$.
With $3$ already occupied, $6$ is left without a partner.
case $n = 10, 12$:
The only partner for $9$ is $7$.
With $7$ already occupied, $2$ is left without a partner.
case $n = 20, 22$:
The only partner for $18$ is $7$.
With $7$ already occupied, the only remaining partner for $2$ is $14$.
With $14$ already occupied, the only remaining partner for $11$ is $5$.
With $5$ already occupied, the only remaining partner for $20$ is $16$.
With $16$ and $7$ already occupied, $9$ is left without a partner.

Claim (2) - Pairings for small cases

Except for the exceptional cases, there is a pairing for each even $n$ up to $62$.

Proof.


Claim (3) - The main inequality

For each $n \geq 64$, the inequality $68n \leq n^2 + 276$ holds.

Proof. Proceed by induction on $n$. The statement is true for $n = 64$, since the lhs of the inequality evaluates to $4352$ and the rhs evaluates to $4372$. Now assume the statement is true for $n \geq 64$ and note that $68 \leq 2n + 1$. Adding this inequality to the induction hypothesis gives

\[68n + 68 \leq n^2 + 276 + 2n + 1\]

which simplifies to

\[68(n + 1) \leq (n + 1)^2 + 276\]

and this gives the statement for $n + 1$.

Claim (4) - Rewriting the main inequality

For each $n \geq 64$, the inequality $n + 4\sqrt{n + 25} + 29 \leq 2n + 3$ holds.

Proof. Start with the inequality from Claim (3).

\[68n \leq n^2 + 276\]

Subtract $52n$ from both sides

\[16n \leq n^2 - 52n + 276\]

Add $400$ to both sides

\[16n + 400 \leq n^2 - 52n + 676\]

Factor both sides, using the binomial formula for the rhs

\[16(n + 25) \leq (n - 26)^2\]

Take the square root of both sides

\[4\sqrt{n + 25} \leq n - 26\]

Finally, adding $n + 29$ to both sides gives the statement.

Claim (5) - Finding odd perfect squares

For each even $n \geq 64$ there is an odd perfect square in the closed interval $[n + 24, 2n - 1]$.

Proof. Proceed by induction on the even $n$. The statement is true for $n = 64$, since

\[n + 24 = 88 \leq 11^2 = 121 \leq 127 = 2n - 1\]

Now assume that the statement is true for $n$, that is, there is an odd $k$ with $n + 24 \leq k^2 \leq 2n - 1$. If $k^2$ is already at least $n + 26$, then $k^2$ also satisfies the statement for $n + 2$, since then

\[(n + 2) + 24 = n + 26 \leq k^2 \leq 2n - 1 \leq 2n + 3 = 2(n + 2) - 1\]

The remaining case $n + 24 \leq k^2 < n + 26$ actually simplifies to

\[k^2 = n + 25\]

since the case $k^2 = n + 24$ is ruled out, because $n$ is even and $k$ is odd. Add $4k + 4$ to the equation above and obtain

\[k^2 + 4k + 4 = n + 4k + 29\]

Factoring the lhs and replacing $k$ in the rhs gives

\[(k + 2)^2 = n + 4\sqrt{n + 25} + 29\]

By Claim (4), this expression is less or equal to $2n + 3$. Hence, $(k + 2)^2$ is an odd perfect square in the interval $[(n + 2) + 24, 2(n + 2) - 1]$ and this concludes the induction.

The Finish

Using the claims, we prove the Main Statement by induction on the even $n$.

By the Claims (1) and (2), the Main Statement is true for all $n \leq 62$.

Now let $n$ be even with $n \geq 64$. With Claim (5), we find an odd perfect square $k^2$ in the interval $[n + 24, 2n - 1]$. Let $p = k^2 - n$ and observe

\[24 \leq p \leq n - 1\]

which implies the stronger inequality

\[24 < p \leq n - 1\]

since $p$ is odd. By construction of $p$, $p$ and $n$ sum up to $k^2$ and hence are partners. Furthermore, since $p$ and $n$ are of opposite parity, there is an even number of numbers strictly between them. These numbers may be paired up straightforward in the following way

\[(p + 1) + (n - 1) = k^2\] \[(p + 2) + (n - 2) = k^2\] \[(p + 3) + (n - 3) = k^2\] \[\dots\]

Hence, in order to complete the pairing for all numbers up to $n$, it only remains to pair up the numbers up to $p - 1$. Note that $p - 1$ is even.

If $64 \leq p - 1$, then apply Claim (5) recursively again, to $p - 1$ instead of $n$, in order to pair up another portion of the yet unpaired numbers. Eventually, we will reach a scenario where $p - 1 \leq 62$. By the construction of $p$ we know that $24 \leq p - 1$. Hence $p - 1$ cannot be one of the exceptional cases and we may apply Claim (2) to find a pairing for all the remaining numbers up to $p - 1$.