Difference between revisions of "Stabilizer"

(start)
 
(added a proposition)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Specifically, let <math>M</math> be a monoid operating on a set <math>S</math>, and let <math>A</math> be a subset of <math>S</math>.  The ''stabilizer'' of <math>A</math>, sometimes denoted <math>\text{stab}(A)</math>, is the set of elements of <math>a</math> of <math>M</math> for which <math>a(A) \subseteq  A</math>; the ''strict stabilizer''' is the set of <math>a \in M</math> for which <math>a(A)=A</math>.  In other words, the stabilizer of <math>A</math> is the [[transporter]] of <math>A</math> to itself.
 
Specifically, let <math>M</math> be a monoid operating on a set <math>S</math>, and let <math>A</math> be a subset of <math>S</math>.  The ''stabilizer'' of <math>A</math>, sometimes denoted <math>\text{stab}(A)</math>, is the set of elements of <math>a</math> of <math>M</math> for which <math>a(A) \subseteq  A</math>; the ''strict stabilizer''' is the set of <math>a \in M</math> for which <math>a(A)=A</math>.  In other words, the stabilizer of <math>A</math> is the [[transporter]] of <math>A</math> to itself.
 +
 +
By abuse of language, for an element <math>x\in S</math>, the stabilizer of <math>\{x\}</math> is called the stabilizer of <math>x</math>.
  
 
The stabilizer of any set <math>A</math> is evidently a sub-monoid of <math>M</math>, as is the strict stabilizer.  Also, if <math>a</math> is an invertible element of <math>M</math> and a member of the strict stabilizer of <math>A</math>, then <math>a^{-1}</math> is also an element of the strict stabilizer of <math>a</math>, for the restriction of the function <math>a : S \to S</math> to <math>A</math> is a bijection from <math>A</math> to itself.
 
The stabilizer of any set <math>A</math> is evidently a sub-monoid of <math>M</math>, as is the strict stabilizer.  Also, if <math>a</math> is an invertible element of <math>M</math> and a member of the strict stabilizer of <math>A</math>, then <math>a^{-1}</math> is also an element of the strict stabilizer of <math>a</math>, for the restriction of the function <math>a : S \to S</math> to <math>A</math> is a bijection from <math>A</math> to itself.
  
It follows that if <math>M</math> is a group <math>G</math>, then the strict stabilizer of <math>A</math> is a [[subgroup]] of <math>G</math>, since every element of <math>G</math> is a bijection on <math>S</math>, but the stabilizer need not be.  For example, let <math>G=S= \mathbb{Z}</math>, with <math>g(s) = g+s</math>, and let <math>A=\mathbb{Z}_{>0}</math>.  Then the stabilizer of <math>A</math> is the set of nonnegative integers, which is evidently not a group.  On the other hand, the strict stabilizer of <math>A</math> is the set <math>\{0\}</math>, the trivial group.  On the other hand, if <math>A</math> is ''finite'', then the strict stabilizer and the stabilizer are one and the same, since <math>a : S \to S</math> is bijective, for all <math>a\in G</math>.
+
It follows that if <math>M</math> is a [[group]] <math>G</math>, then the strict stabilizer of <math>A</math> is a [[subgroup]] of <math>G</math>, since every element of <math>G</math> is a [[bijection]] on <math>S</math>, but the stabilizer need not be.  For example, let <math>G=S= \mathbb{Z}</math>, with <math>g(s) = g+s</math>, and let <math>A=\mathbb{Z}_{>0}</math>.  Then the stabilizer of <math>A</math> is the set of nonnegative [[integer]]s, which is evidently not a group.  On the other hand, the strict stabilizer of <math>A</math> is the set <math>\{0\}</math>, the trivial group.  On the other hand, if <math>A</math> is ''finite'', then the strict stabilizer and the stabilizer are one and the same, since <math>a : S \to S</math> is bijective, for all <math>a\in G</math>.
 +
 
 +
'''Proposition.''' Let <math>G</math> be a group acting on a set <math>S</math>.  Then for all <math>x\in S</math> and all <math>a \in G</math>, <math>\text{stab}(ax) = a\, \text{stab}(x) a^{-1}</math>.
 +
 
 +
''Proof.''  Note that for any <math>g \in \text{stab}(x)</math>, <math>(aga^{-1})ax = agx = ax.</math>  It follows that
 +
<cmath> a\, \text{stab}(x) a^{-1} \subseteq \text{stab}(ax) . </cmath>
 +
By simultaneously replacing <math>x</math> with <math>ax</math> and <math>a</math> with <math>a^{-1}</math>, we have
 +
<cmath> \text{stab}(ax) \subseteq  a\, \text{stab}(x) a^{-1} , </cmath>
 +
whence the desired result.  <math>\blacksquare</math>
  
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}

Revision as of 22:33, 21 May 2008

A stabilizer is a part of a monoid (or group) acting on a set.

Specifically, let $M$ be a monoid operating on a set $S$, and let $A$ be a subset of $S$. The stabilizer of $A$, sometimes denoted $\text{stab}(A)$, is the set of elements of $a$ of $M$ for which $a(A) \subseteq  A$; the strict stabilizer' is the set of $a \in M$ for which $a(A)=A$. In other words, the stabilizer of $A$ is the transporter of $A$ to itself.

By abuse of language, for an element $x\in S$, the stabilizer of $\{x\}$ is called the stabilizer of $x$.

The stabilizer of any set $A$ is evidently a sub-monoid of $M$, as is the strict stabilizer. Also, if $a$ is an invertible element of $M$ and a member of the strict stabilizer of $A$, then $a^{-1}$ is also an element of the strict stabilizer of $a$, for the restriction of the function $a : S \to S$ to $A$ is a bijection from $A$ to itself.

It follows that if $M$ is a group $G$, then the strict stabilizer of $A$ is a subgroup of $G$, since every element of $G$ is a bijection on $S$, but the stabilizer need not be. For example, let $G=S= \mathbb{Z}$, with $g(s) = g+s$, and let $A=\mathbb{Z}_{>0}$. Then the stabilizer of $A$ is the set of nonnegative integers, which is evidently not a group. On the other hand, the strict stabilizer of $A$ is the set $\{0\}$, the trivial group. On the other hand, if $A$ is finite, then the strict stabilizer and the stabilizer are one and the same, since $a : S \to S$ is bijective, for all $a\in G$.

Proposition. Let $G$ be a group acting on a set $S$. Then for all $x\in S$ and all $a \in G$, $\text{stab}(ax) = a\, \text{stab}(x) a^{-1}$.

Proof. Note that for any $g \in \text{stab}(x)$, $(aga^{-1})ax = agx = ax.$ It follows that \[a\, \text{stab}(x) a^{-1} \subseteq \text{stab}(ax) .\] By simultaneously replacing $x$ with $ax$ and $a$ with $a^{-1}$, we have \[\text{stab}(ax) \subseteq  a\, \text{stab}(x) a^{-1} ,\] whence the desired result. $\blacksquare$

This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.

See also