Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean Inequality"

(New page: This article has a fairly sloppy feel to me. It seems as though a desire to express results is conflicting with a desire not to intimidate beginners. To me, that suggests splitting the a...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This article has a fairly sloppy feel to me.  It seems as though a desire to express results is conflicting with a desire not to intimidate beginners.  To me, that suggests splitting the article into introductory and advanced articles, or even introductory, intermediate, and advanced.  Does anybody else think this would be a good move?  —[[User:Boy Soprano II|Boy Soprano II]] 16:37, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 
This article has a fairly sloppy feel to me.  It seems as though a desire to express results is conflicting with a desire not to intimidate beginners.  To me, that suggests splitting the article into introductory and advanced articles, or even introductory, intermediate, and advanced.  Does anybody else think this would be a good move?  —[[User:Boy Soprano II|Boy Soprano II]] 16:37, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 +
:Agree, but I think we could just split the article up into several sections on the same page, since together the parts probably wouldn't take up that much space (I could easily be wrong on that). <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 16:44, 31 December 2007 (EST)

Latest revision as of 17:44, 31 December 2007

This article has a fairly sloppy feel to me. It seems as though a desire to express results is conflicting with a desire not to intimidate beginners. To me, that suggests splitting the article into introductory and advanced articles, or even introductory, intermediate, and advanced. Does anybody else think this would be a good move? —Boy Soprano II 16:37, 31 December 2007 (EST)

Agree, but I think we could just split the article up into several sections on the same page, since together the parts probably wouldn't take up that much space (I could easily be wrong on that). Azjps (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2007 (EST)