Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cartesian product"
(New page: Would it not be better to redirect this page to the "operations" section of the Set page? I don't know if we can link to a section of a page instead of the article itself.) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would it not be better to redirect this page to the "operations" section of the [[Set]] page? I don't know if we can link to a section of a page instead of the article itself. | Would it not be better to redirect this page to the "operations" section of the [[Set]] page? I don't know if we can link to a section of a page instead of the article itself. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Shreyas patankar|Shreyas patankar]] 19:57, 28 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : It is possible (you do something like <nowiki>[[Main page#section title]]</nowiki>), but Cartesian products are an important basic idea and so reasonably deserving of their own page. I think it makes more sense to put a small section on them in the page for [[set]]s and link that page here (I think the template for that is something like <nowiki>{{main|Cartesian product}}</nowiki>, but I'm not positive) than the reverse. --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 09:17, 29 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:17, 29 January 2008
Would it not be better to redirect this page to the "operations" section of the Set page? I don't know if we can link to a section of a page instead of the article itself.
Shreyas patankar 19:57, 28 January 2008 (EST)
- It is possible (you do something like [[Main page#section title]]), but Cartesian products are an important basic idea and so reasonably deserving of their own page. I think it makes more sense to put a small section on them in the page for sets and link that page here (I think the template for that is something like {{main|Cartesian product}}, but I'm not positive) than the reverse. --JBL 09:17, 29 January 2008 (EST)
