Difference between revisions of "Talk:Collatz Problem"
(New page: From Cauchy Induction, f(1) and f(2) both have a 1 in there somewhere, and we can easily prove that if it's true for n, then it's true for 2n. Now we just need to prove that if it's tr...) |
Wizlearner (talk | contribs) (→Cauchy induction: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
From [[Cauchy Induction]], f(1) and f(2) both have a 1 in there somewhere, and we can easily prove that if it's true for n, then it's true for 2n. Now we just need to prove that if it's true for n, it's true for n-1. --[[User:1=2|1=2]] 23:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | From [[Cauchy Induction]], f(1) and f(2) both have a 1 in there somewhere, and we can easily prove that if it's true for n, then it's true for 2n. Now we just need to prove that if it's true for n, it's true for n-1. --[[User:1=2|1=2]] 23:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Cauchy induction == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sutanay please expound Collateral problem | ||
Revision as of 07:30, 27 July 2018
From Cauchy Induction, f(1) and f(2) both have a 1 in there somewhere, and we can easily prove that if it's true for n, then it's true for 2n. Now we just need to prove that if it's true for n, it's true for n-1. --1=2 23:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Cauchy induction
Sutanay please expound Collateral problem
