Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monoid"
ComplexZeta (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Monoids are important for category theory though, right? --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 00:01, 13 October 2006 (EDT) | Monoids are important for category theory though, right? --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 00:01, 13 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, monoidal categories are reasonably important objects in category theory (or at least that's the sense I have), but I certainly am not prepared to write anything about them :) --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 10:02, 13 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 13 October 2006
Monoids are important for category theory though, right? --ComplexZeta 00:01, 13 October 2006 (EDT)
Yes, monoidal categories are reasonably important objects in category theory (or at least that's the sense I have), but I certainly am not prepared to write anything about them :) --JBL 10:02, 13 October 2006 (EDT)
