Difference between revisions of "Talk:Power set"

 
(hm)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I deleted the part that said that for no infinite set was there a bijection between the set and its power set.  I am fairly certain that this is undecided.  It certainly is known that the proposition <math>\displaystyle 2^{\aleph _{n} } = \aleph _{ n+1 }</math> is undecidable, so I am very suspicious of a proposition that such a cardinality as <math>\displaystyle \aleph _{n>1} </math> exists at all.  Or are these cardinalities known to exist after allIf so, how are they defined? &mdash;[[User:Boy Soprano II|Boy Soprano II]] 21:35, 26 August 2006 (EDT)
+
{{AotD tag|January 25th, 2008}}
 +
I claimed that that proof doesn't rely on the axiom of choice: is this really true--[[User:JBL|JBL]] 11:56, 7 September 2006 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 20:35, 25 January 2008

AoPSWiki Article of the Day
Power set was the AoPSWiki Article of the Day for January 25th, 2008

I claimed that that proof doesn't rely on the axiom of choice: is this really true? --JBL 11:56, 7 September 2006 (EDT)