Difference between revisions of "Talk:Twin Prime Conjecture"

(Comment that the alleged proof is utterly bogus.)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 23:02, 15 September 2020

Is the stuff under "Elementary Proof" meant to illustrate a bogus proof? If so, clearer descriptions of the bogosity would probably be useful. Or, is it provided by someone who thinks this actually is a proof? In that case, we should just delete it.