Difference between revisions of "User talk:Boy Soprano II"

(reply)
 
(New section: Re:Red links)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
([[User talk:Azjps#Discussion|Re]]) Good point. There’s really no pros or cons to having separate categories, so I took them out from the other [[:Category:Succession templates|succession templates]]. <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 20:10, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
 
([[User talk:Azjps#Discussion|Re]]) Good point. There’s really no pros or cons to having separate categories, so I took them out from the other [[:Category:Succession templates|succession templates]]. <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 20:10, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Re:Red links ==
 +
 +
Those exact topics are already thoroughly covered on the article at the third link, and aren't signficant enough to deserve their own article.
 +
 +
If you want, you can make them redirects to the appropriate section in the other article, but then there would hardly be a point in linking to them. [[User:Temperal|Temperal]]<span style="color:red"><small><sup>[[User Talk:Temperal|xy]]</sup></small></span> 17:53, 25 November 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 18:53, 25 November 2007

(Re) Good point. There’s really no pros or cons to having separate categories, so I took them out from the other succession templates. Azjps (talk) 20:10, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Re:Red links

Those exact topics are already thoroughly covered on the article at the third link, and aren't signficant enough to deserve their own article.

If you want, you can make them redirects to the appropriate section in the other article, but then there would hardly be a point in linking to them. Temperalxy 17:53, 25 November 2007 (EST)