Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "Van Aubel's Theorem"

m (→‎Theorem)
(→‎Proof 1: Complex Numbers)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
== Proof 1: Complex Numbers==
 
== Proof 1: Complex Numbers==
 +
[asy]
 +
size(220);
 +
import TrigMacros;
 +
rr_cartesian_axes(-3,8,-2,8,complexplane=true,usegrid = false);
 +
pair U, V, WW, Z, O, P, Q, R, SS;
 +
O = (0,0) ;
 +
A = (2,1.5);
 +
B= (4,1.8);
 +
C = (5.3,3);
 +
D= (3,5.3);
 +
 +
draw(A--B--C--D--cycle);
 +
draw(A--(A + rotate(-90)*(B-A))--(B + rotate(90)*(A-B))--B);
 +
draw(B--(B + rotate(-90)*(C-B))--(C + rotate(90)*(B-C))--C);
 +
draw(C--(C + rotate(-90)*(D-C))--(D + rotate(90)*(C-D))--D);
 +
draw(D--(D + rotate(-90)*(A-D))--(A + rotate(90)*(D-A))--D);
 +
 +
P = (B + (A + rotate(-90)*(B-A)))/2;
 +
Q = (C + (B + rotate(-90)*(C-B)))/2;
 +
R = (D + (C + rotate(-90)*(D-C)))/2;
 +
SS = (A + (D + rotate(-90)*(A-D)))/2;
 +
 +
//draw(WW--Y,red);
 +
//draw(X--Z,blue);
 +
dot("<math>a</math>",U,SW);
 +
dot("<math>b</math>",V,2*E);
 +
dot("<math>c</math>",WW,E);
 +
dot("<math>d</math>",Z,NNW);
 +
 +
dot("<math>p</math>",P,E);
 +
dot("<math>q</math>",Q,S);
 +
dot("<math>r</math>",R,N);
 +
dot("<math>s</math>",SS,S);
 +
[/asy]
 
Putting the diagram on the complex plane, let any point <math>X</math> be represented by the complex number <math>x</math>.  Note that <math>\angle PAB = \frac{\pi}{4}</math> and that <math>PA = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}AB</math>, and similarly for the other sides of the quadrilateral.  Then we have
 
Putting the diagram on the complex plane, let any point <math>X</math> be represented by the complex number <math>x</math>.  Note that <math>\angle PAB = \frac{\pi}{4}</math> and that <math>PA = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}AB</math>, and similarly for the other sides of the quadrilateral.  Then we have
  
Line 28: Line 62:
  
 
Finally, we have <math>(p-r) = i(q-s) = e^{i \pi/2}(q-r)</math>, which implies <math>PR = QS</math> and <math>PR \perp QS</math>, as desired.
 
Finally, we have <math>(p-r) = i(q-s) = e^{i \pi/2}(q-r)</math>, which implies <math>PR = QS</math> and <math>PR \perp QS</math>, as desired.
 +
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
[[Category:Theorems]]
 
[[Category:Theorems]]

Revision as of 13:55, 4 March 2023

Theorem

On each side of quadrilateral $ABCD$, construct an external square and its center: $ABA'B'$, $BCB'C'$, $CDC'D'$, $DAD'A'$; yielding centers $P_{AB}, P_{BC}, P_{CD}, P_{DA}$. Van Aubel's Theorem states that the two line segments connecting opposite centers are perpendicular and equal length: $P_{AB}P_{CD} = P_{BC}P_{DA}$, and $\overline{P_{AB}P_{CD}} \perp \overline{P_{BC}P_{DA}}$.

Proofs

Proof 1: Complex Numbers

[asy] size(220); import TrigMacros; rr_cartesian_axes(-3,8,-2,8,complexplane=true,usegrid = false); pair U, V, WW, Z, O, P, Q, R, SS; O = (0,0) ; A = (2,1.5); B= (4,1.8); C = (5.3,3); D= (3,5.3);

draw(A--B--C--D--cycle); draw(A--(A + rotate(-90)*(B-A))--(B + rotate(90)*(A-B))--B); draw(B--(B + rotate(-90)*(C-B))--(C + rotate(90)*(B-C))--C); draw(C--(C + rotate(-90)*(D-C))--(D + rotate(90)*(C-D))--D); draw(D--(D + rotate(-90)*(A-D))--(A + rotate(90)*(D-A))--D);

P = (B + (A + rotate(-90)*(B-A)))/2; Q = (C + (B + rotate(-90)*(C-B)))/2; R = (D + (C + rotate(-90)*(D-C)))/2; SS = (A + (D + rotate(-90)*(A-D)))/2;

//draw(WW--Y,red); //draw(X--Z,blue); dot("$a$",U,SW); dot("$b$",V,2*E); dot("$c$",WW,E); dot("$d$",Z,NNW);

dot("$p$",P,E); dot("$q$",Q,S); dot("$r$",R,N); dot("$s$",SS,S); [/asy] Putting the diagram on the complex plane, let any point $X$ be represented by the complex number $x$. Note that $\angle PAB = \frac{\pi}{4}$ and that $PA = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}AB$, and similarly for the other sides of the quadrilateral. Then we have


\begin{eqnarray*} p &=& \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(b-a)e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}}+a \\ q &=& \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(c-b)e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}}+b \\ r &=& \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(d-c)e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}}+c \\ s &=& \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(a-d)e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}}+d \end{eqnarray*}

From this, we find that \begin{eqnarray*} p-r &=& \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(b-a)e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}}+a - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(d-c)e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}}-c \\ &=& \frac{1+i}{2}(b-d) + \frac{1-i}{2}(a-c). \end{eqnarray*} Similarly, \begin{eqnarray*} q-s &=& \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(c-b)e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}}+a - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(a-d)e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}}-c \\ &=& \frac{1+i}{2}(c-a) + \frac{1-i}{2}(b-d). \end{eqnarray*}

Finally, we have $(p-r) = i(q-s) = e^{i \pi/2}(q-r)$, which implies $PR = QS$ and $PR \perp QS$, as desired.

See Also

Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=Van_Aubel%27s_Theorem&oldid=190613"