1996 IMO Problems/Problem 1
Contents
[hide]Problem
We are given a positive integer and a rectangular board
with dimensions
,
. The rectangle is divided into a grid of
unit squares. The following moves are permitted on the board: one can move from one square to another only if the distance between the centers of the two squares is
. The task is to find a sequence of moves leading from the square with
as a vertex to the square with
as a vertex.
(a) Show that the task cannot be done if is divisible by
or
.
(b) Prove that the task is possible when .
(c) Can the task be done when ?
Solution
First we define the rectangular board in the cartesian plane with centers of the unit squares as integer coordinates and the following coordinates for the squares at the corners of ,
,
,
, as follows:
,
,
,
Let be the coordinates of the piece after move
with
the initial position of the piece.
, and also
.
Let ,
Then, for any given , we have
for all
Part (a):
In order to find out the conditions for which is divisible by 2 we are going to look at the following three cases:
(1) When both and
are divisible by
.
(2) When both and
are odd.
(3) When one of and
is even and the other one is odd.
Case (1): Since and
,
then .
Thus, for , this case is a valid one.
Case (2): Since and
,
then .
Thus, for , this case is a valid one.
Case (3): Since and
, or
and
,
then .
Thus, for , this case is NOT a valid one.
Having proved that Case (1) and Case (2) are the only valid cases for we are going to see what happens for both cases when we start with a square where both coordinates are odd:
if ,
then for case (1):
and for case (2):
and
This means that when is divisible by two, when starting at
no matter how many moves you make all
will either be
or
.
Since the ending coordinate is and
, then the task cannot be done if
is divisible by
.
Now we look at the conditions for which is divisible by 3 by looking at the following three cases:
(4) When both and
are divisible by
.
(5) When one of them is not divisible by and the other one is.
(6) When neither nor
is divisible by
.
Case (4): Since and
,
then .
Thus, for , this case is a valid one.
Case (5): Since either or
and the other
,
then .
Thus, for , this case is NOT a valid one.
Case (6): Since and
,
then .
Thus, for , this case is NOT a valid one.
Having proved that Case (4) is the only valid case for we are going to see what happens when we start with a square that is
if , then
.
Therefore starting at any no matter how many moves the piece will always land at another square
. Since we start at
, then the piece will always land at squares that are
.
Since final square is , then the task cannot be done if
is divisible by
.
In summary the task cannot be done if is divisible by
or
is divisible by
.
Part (b):
When we have
Therefore the moves can have the following values:
Since we start at and we want to end at
we can write the following
valid moves:
Having shown that all moves comply with the possible values for and that all
are inside the rectangular grid, then the task is possible when
.
Part (c):
When we have
Therefore the moves can have the following values:
Let be a set of the squares of the rectangle with the condition
for
. That is, the reminder of
when divided by 2 is the same as the reminder of
when divided by 2 where
is the smallest integer that is not less than
. If that condition is true, then
Now let's look at a case (c1) where and
, thus
:
c1 subcase 1 : :
and
since , then
for this subcase.
c1 subcase 2 : :
This move is not allowed because the only values of such that
are
. Adding or subtracting 9 from any of these numbers will either make
or
and will put the piece outside of the board.
In summary, for case (c1),
Now let's look at a case (c2) where and
, thus
:
c2 subcase 1 : :
and
since , then
for this subcase.
c2 subcase 2 : :
Notice that the only values of such that
are
. Adding 9 to the values of 1,2, or 3 or subtracting 9 from the values of 10, 11, or 12, will result in
. However, subtracting 9 from the values of 1,2, or 3, or adding 9 for the values of 10,11, or 12 will put the piece outside the board and not a valid move. Furthermore, for the values of 4 and 9, adding or subtracting 9 from them will result in the piece being outside of the board and not a valid move. Therefore for all valid moves in this subcase which are 9 added to 1, 2, or 3 or 9 subtracted from 10, 11, or 12, the result will be
since , then
for this subcase.
In summary, for case (c2),
Therefore if then
Now we look at the starting point: :
Since and
, then
and all subsequent squares after that
Now let's look at the end point: :
Since and
, then
and
Since , then there are no valid moves starting from
that will end in
Therefore the task cannot be done when .
~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com
Solution 2
Slightly different than the first solution, we identify the board with the cartersian plane with the center of the squares integer coordinates such that .
Part (a): If and
are the change in the
coordinate and
coordinate respectively for a move, one finds
hence both
are even or both
are odd. Hence, since
we start at
, for any sequence of moves of distance
, the current position
will always have the same parity between
and
. On the other hand
has a different parity between the first and second coordinate, so it is not possible to reach
with
.
If , defining
the same one similarly finds
hence
. Considering the possible values of
mod
, the only way this is possible is if both
are divisible by
. Hence, since we start at
, for any sequence of moves of distance
, the current position
will have both
divisible by
. On the other hand
doesn't have both coordinates divisible by
. So it is not possible to reach
with
.
Part (b): Note . The following sequence of moves have
and show it is possible.
Part (c): Suppose by contradiction a sequence of moves reaches from
. Let
be the number of moves where the second coordinate increased/decreased by a distance of
respectively, and
be the number of moves where the second coordinate increased/decreased by a distance of
respectively. Apparently
Let
be the number of moves where the first coordinate increased/decreased by a
distance of
respectively, and
be the number of moves where the first coordinate increased/decreased by
respectively. Apparently
If
then since
and
one finds
and
. In which case the above equation doesn't have an integer solution. Therefore
and
are not both zero.
Now, the second coordinate must start at and end at
. If the sequence of moves simply adds values to the
second coordinate and eventually subtracts those same values both
and
will be zero, contradicting the previous. (Or if it subtracts values and eventually adds those same values back).
At each step we may add , subtract
, or add
, or subtract
to the second coordinate without leaving the game board. There are only two possible non-repeating sequences:
and
at which points there are no non-repeating moves possible since a
coordinate value of
is outside the game board. Thus in order to return to
the sequence is forced to subtract the same values added (or add the same values subtracted), contradicting
the previous. So it is not possible to find a solution with
.
~not_detriti
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
1996 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First Problem |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |