Cauchy's Integral Formula

Cauchy's Integral Formula is a fundamental result in complex analysis. It states that if $U$ is a subset of the complex plane containing a simple counterclockwise loop $C$ and the region bounded by $C$, and $f$ is a complex-differentiable function on $U$, then for any $z_0$ in the interior of the region bounded by $C$, \[\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int\limits_C \frac{f(z)}{z- z_0}dz = f(z_0) .\]

Proof

Let $D$ denote the interior of the region bounded by $C$. Let $C_r$ denote a simple counterclockwise loop about $z_0$ of radius $r$. Since the interior of the region bounded by $C$ is an open set, there is some $R$ such that $C_r \subset D$ for all $r \in (0, R)$. For such values of $r$, \[\int\limits_C \frac{f(z)}{z-z_0}dz = \int\limits_{C_r} \frac{f(z)}{z-z_0}dz ,\] by application of Cauchy's Integral Theorem.

Since $f$ is differentiable at $z_0$, for any $\epsilon$ we may pick an arbitarily small $r>0$ such that \[\left\lvert \frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_0} - f'(z_0) \right\rvert < \epsilon\] whenever $\lvert z - z_0 \rvert \le r$. Let us parameterize $C_r$ as $h(t) = r e^{it}+ z_0$, for $t\in [0,2\pi]$. Since $\int\limits_{C_r} f'(z_0)dz = 0$ (again by Cauchy's Integral Theorem), it follows that \begin{align*} \biggl\lvert \int\limits_{C_r} \frac{f(z)}{z-z_0}dz - \int\limits_{C_r} \frac{f(z_0)}{z-z_0}dz \biggr\rvert &= \biggl\lvert \int\limits_{C_r} \left[ \frac{f(z) - f(z_0)}{z-z_0} - f'(z_0) \right] dz \biggr\rvert \\ &\le \int\limits_0^{2\pi} \left\lvert \frac{f(h(t)) - f(z_0)}{ h(t) - z_0} - f'(z_0) \right\vert \cdot r dt \\ &< \int\limits_0^{2\pi} \epsilon \cdot r dt = 2\pi \epsilon r . \end{align*} Since $\epsilon$ and $r$ can simultaneously become arbitrarily small, it follows that \begin{align*} \int\limits_C \frac{f(z)}{z-z_0}dz &= \int\limits_{C_r} \frac{f(z_0)} {z- z_0}dz \\ &= f(z_0) \int\limits_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{h'(t)}{h(t) - z_0} dt \\ &= f(z_0) \int\limits_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{ir e^{it}}{re^{it}} dt \\ &= f(z_0) \cdot 2\pi i , \end{align*} which is equivalent to the desired theorem. $\blacksquare$

Consequences

By induction, we see that the $n$th derivative of $f$ at $z_0$ is \[f^{(n)}(z_0) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i} \int\limits_C \frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^{n+1}}dz,\] for $n>0$. In particular, the $n$th derivative exists at $z_0$, for all $n>0$. In other words, if a function $f$ is complex-differentiable on some region, then it is infinitely differentiable on the interior of that region.

Since the $(n+1)$th derivative exists in general, it follows that the $n$th derivative is continuous. This is not true for functions of real variables! For instance the real function \[f(x) = \begin{cases} x \sin(1/x), & x \neq 0 \\ 0, & x=0 \end{cases}\] is everywhere differentiable, but its derivative is mysteriously not continuous at $x=0$. In complex analysis, the mystery disappears: the function $z\sin(1/z) = z\frac{e^{i/z} - e^{-i/z}}{2i}$ has an essential singularity at $z=0$, so we can't establish a derivative there in any case.

The theorem is useful for estimating a function (or its $n$th derivative) at a point based on the behavior of the function around the point. For instance, the theorem yields an easy proof that holomorphic functions are in fact analytic.

See also

Invalid username
Login to AoPS