Difference between revisions of "1982 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
(Created page with "==Problem== The function <math>f(n)</math> is defined on the positive integers and takes non-negative integer values. <math>f(2)=0,f(3)>0,f(9999)=3333</math> and for all <math...") |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
− | == See Also == {{IMO box|year= | + | == See Also == {{IMO box|year=1982|before=First Question|num-a=2}} |
Latest revision as of 22:17, 29 January 2021
Problem
The function is defined on the positive integers and takes non-negative integer values. and for all Determine .
Solution 1
Clearly so .Contradiction!So .This forces .Hence so the inequality forces .Now (Note:This is valid for or ).Contradiction!Hence the non-decreasing nature of gives .Hence .
So .
This solution was posted and copyrighted by sayantanchakraborty. The original thread for this problem can be found here: [1]
Solution 2
First observe that Since is a positive integer, we need . Next, observe that \begin{align*} 3333=f(9999)\geq 5f(1980)+33f(3)=5f(1980)+33\quad\Longrightarrow\quad f(1980)\leq 660 \end{align*}On the other hand, , so combine the two inequalities we obtain . Finally, write Suppose that , then \begin{align*} 3333=f(9999)\geq 5f(1982)+29f(3)=3305+29=3334 \end{align*}a contradiction. Hence we conclude that .
This solution was posted and copyrighted by Solumilkyu. The original thread for this problem can be found here: [2]
Solution 3
We show that for , where [ ] denotes the integral part. We show first that . must be , otherwise would be negative. Hence or = or . But we are told , so . It follows by induction that . For + or or . Moreover if we ever get , then the same argument shows that for all . But , so for all . Now or = or . But , so . Hence Similarly, . In particular .
This solution was posted and copyrighted by Tega. The original thread for this problem can be found here: [3]
Solution 4
Similar to solution 3.
Proof: Lemma 1: Let, be assertion. Similarly,we can induct to get . Lemma proved.
Then we see that, Then, Then we can easily get,by assertion Hence, .And, we are done.
This solution was posted and copyrighted by IMO2019. The original thread for this problem can be found here: [4]
See Also
1982 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First Question |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |