Difference between revisions of "1986 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
(→Solution 3) |
Lovematch13 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1: Got rid of informal slang (changed mods to modular arithmetic)) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===Solution 1=== | ===Solution 1=== | ||
− | We do casework with | + | We do casework with modular arithmetic. |
<math>d\equiv 0,3 \pmod{4}: 13d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | <math>d\equiv 0,3 \pmod{4}: 13d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
{{IMO box|year=1986|before=First Problem|num-a=2}} | {{IMO box|year=1986|before=First Problem|num-a=2}} |
Revision as of 14:02, 31 July 2022
Contents
Problem
Let be any positive integer not equal to or . Show that one can find distinct in the set such that is not a perfect square.
Solution
Solution 1
We do casework with modular arithmetic.
is not a perfect square.
is not a perfect square.
Therefore, Now consider
is not a perfect square.
is not a perfect square.
As we have covered all possible cases, we are done.
Solution 2
Proof by contradiction:
Suppose , and . From the first equation, is an odd integer. Let . We have , which is an odd integer. Then and must be even integers, denoted by and respectively, and thus , from which can be deduced. Since is even, and have the same parity, so is divisible by . It follows that the odd integer must be divisible by , leading to a contradiction. We are done.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
1986 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First Problem |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |