Difference between revisions of "1986 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
(Created page with "== Problem == Let <math>d</math> be any positive integer not equal to <math>2, 5</math> or <math>13</math>. Show that one can find distinct <math>a,b</math> in the set <math>...") |
Lovematch13 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1: Got rid of informal slang (changed mods to modular arithmetic)) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | We do casework with | + | ===Solution 1=== |
+ | We do casework with modular arithmetic. | ||
− | <math>d\equiv 0 \pmod{4}: 13d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | + | <math>d\equiv 0,3 \pmod{4}: 13d-1</math> is not a perfect square. |
<math>d\equiv 2\pmod{4}: 2d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | <math>d\equiv 2\pmod{4}: 2d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | ||
− | + | Therefore, <math>d\equiv 1, \pmod{4}.</math> Now consider <math>d\pmod{16}.</math> | |
− | |||
− | Therefore, <math>d\equiv 1 \pmod{4}.</math> Now consider <math>d\pmod{16}.</math> | ||
<math>d\equiv 1,13 \pmod{16}: 13d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | <math>d\equiv 1,13 \pmod{16}: 13d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | ||
Line 20: | Line 19: | ||
As we have covered all possible cases, we are done. | As we have covered all possible cases, we are done. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Solution 2=== | ||
+ | Proof by contradiction: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Suppose <math>p^2=2d-1</math>, <math>q^2=5d-1</math> and <math>r^2=13d-1</math>. From the first equation, <math>p</math> is an odd integer. Let <math>p=2k-1</math>. We have <math>d=2k^2-2k+1</math>, which is an odd integer. Then <math>q^2</math> and <math>r^2</math> must be even integers, denoted by <math>4n^2</math> and <math>4m^2</math> respectively, and thus <math>r^2-q^2=4m^2-4n^2=8d</math>, from which | ||
+ | <cmath>2d=m^2-n^2=(m+n)(m-n)</cmath> can be deduced. Since <math>m^2-n^2</math> is even, <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> have the same parity, so <math>(m+n)(m-n)</math> is divisible by <math>4</math>. It follows that the odd integer <math>d</math> must be divisible by <math>2</math>, leading to a contradiction. We are done. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
{{IMO box|year=1986|before=First Problem|num-a=2}} | {{IMO box|year=1986|before=First Problem|num-a=2}} |
Revision as of 14:02, 31 July 2022
Contents
Problem
Let be any positive integer not equal to or . Show that one can find distinct in the set such that is not a perfect square.
Solution
Solution 1
We do casework with modular arithmetic.
is not a perfect square.
is not a perfect square.
Therefore, Now consider
is not a perfect square.
is not a perfect square.
As we have covered all possible cases, we are done.
Solution 2
Proof by contradiction:
Suppose , and . From the first equation, is an odd integer. Let . We have , which is an odd integer. Then and must be even integers, denoted by and respectively, and thus , from which can be deduced. Since is even, and have the same parity, so is divisible by . It follows that the odd integer must be divisible by , leading to a contradiction. We are done.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
1986 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First Problem |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |