Difference between revisions of "Newton's Inequality"
(→Proof) |
Turtleman64 (talk | contribs) m (→Background) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
which holds by the [[rearrangement inequality]]. | which holds by the [[rearrangement inequality]]. | ||
− | + | ''Proof: without calculus'' | |
+ | |||
We will proceed by induction on <math>n</math>. | We will proceed by induction on <math>n</math>. | ||
− | + | For <math>n =2</math>, the inequality just reduces to AM-GM inequality. | |
− | + | Now suppose that for <math>n =m-1</math> some positive integer <math>m\ge 3</math> the inequality holds. | |
− | + | Let <math>x_1</math>, <math>x_2</math>, <math>\ldots</math>, <math>x_m</math> be non-negative numbers and <math>d_k</math> be the symmetric averages of them. | |
− | + | Let <math>d'_k</math> be the symmetric averages of <math>x_1</math>, <math>\ldots</math>, <math>x_{m-1}</math>. | |
− | + | Note that <math>d_k = \frac{n-k}{n} {d'}_k + \frac{k}{n} {d'}_{k-1} x_m</math>. | |
− | + | <cmath> | |
− | d_{k-1}d_{k+1} = | + | d_{k-1}d_{k+1} = \left(\frac{n-k+1}{n} {d'}_{k-1} + \frac{k-1}{n} {d'}_{k-2} x_m \right)\left(\frac{n-k-1}{n} {d'}_{k+1} + \frac{k+1}{n} {d'}_k x_m \right) |
− | = | + | </cmath> |
− | + | <cmath> | |
− | \le | + | = \frac{(n-k+1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}{d'}_{k+1} + \frac{(k-1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-2} {d'}_{k+1} x_m |
− | + | </cmath> | |
− | \le | + | <cmath> |
− | + | + \frac{(n-k+1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}{d'}_k x_m + \frac{(k-1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-2}{d'}_k x_m^2 | |
− | = | + | </cmath> |
− | \le | + | <cmath> |
− | + | \le \frac{(n-k+1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_k^2 + \frac{(k-1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-2} {d'}_{k+1} x_m | |
− | + | </cmath> | |
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | + \frac{(n-k+1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}{d'}_k x_m + \frac{(k-1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}^2 x_m^2 | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \le \frac{(n-k+1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_k^2 + \frac{(k-1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1} {d'}_{k} x_m | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | + \frac{(n-k+1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}{d'}_k x_m + \frac{(k-1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}^2 x_m^2 | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | = \frac{(n-k)^2}{n^2} {d'}_k^2 + \frac{2(n-k)k}{n^2} {d'}_k {d'}_{k-1} x_m +\frac{k^2}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}^2 x_m^2 - \left(\frac{d_k}{n} - \frac{d_{k-1}x_m}{n}\right)^2 | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \le \left(\frac{n-k}{n} {d'}_k + \frac{k}{n} {d'}_{k-1} x_m \right)^2 = d_k^2 | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | By induction this completes the proof. | ||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
− | |||
* [[Inequality]] | * [[Inequality]] | ||
+ | * [[Maclaurin's Inequality]] | ||
− | + | [[Category:Algebra]] | |
− | + | [[Category:Inequalities]] | |
− | [[Category: | ||
− | |||
− | [[Category: |
Revision as of 04:05, 28 January 2023
Contents
[hide]Background
For , we define the symmetric sum
to be the coefficient of
in the polynomial
(see Viete's sums). We define the symmetric average
to be
.
Statement
For non-negative and
,
,
with equality exactly when all the are equal.
Proof
Lemma.
For real , there exist real
with the same symmetric averages
.
Proof.
We consider the derivative of . The roots of
are
. Without loss of generality, we assume that the
increase as
increases. Now for any
,
must have a root between
and
by Rolle's theorem if
, and if
, then
is a root of
times, so it must be a root of
times. It follows that
must have
non-positive, real roots, i.e., for some non-negative reals
,
.
It follows that the symmetric sum for
is
, so the symmetric average
.
Thus to prove Newton's theorem, it is sufficient to prove
for any . Since this is a homogenous inequality, we may normalize it so that
. The inequality then becomes
.
Expanding the left side, we see that this is
.
But this is clearly equivalent to
,
which holds by the rearrangement inequality.
Proof: without calculus
We will proceed by induction on .
For , the inequality just reduces to AM-GM inequality.
Now suppose that for
some positive integer
the inequality holds.
Let ,
,
,
be non-negative numbers and
be the symmetric averages of them.
Let
be the symmetric averages of
,
,
.
Note that
.
By induction this completes the proof.