Difference between revisions of "Lucas' Theorem"
I like pie (talk | contribs) m (→See also) |
I like pie (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Lemma == | == Lemma == | ||
For <math>p</math> prime and <math>x,r\in\mathbb{Z}</math>, | For <math>p</math> prime and <math>x,r\in\mathbb{Z}</math>, | ||
− | < | + | <center><math>(1+x)^{p^r}\equiv 1+x^{p^r}\pmod{p}</math></center> |
=== Proof === | === Proof === | ||
For all <math>1\leq k \leq p-1</math>, <math>\binom{p}{k}\equiv 0 \pmod{p}</math>. Then we have | For all <math>1\leq k \leq p-1</math>, <math>\binom{p}{k}\equiv 0 \pmod{p}</math>. Then we have |
Revision as of 20:32, 21 April 2008
Lucas' Theorem states that for any prime , if is the base representation of and is the base representation of , where , then .
Contents
Lemma
For prime and ,
Proof
For all , . Then we have
Assume we have . Then
&\equiv&\left((1+x)^{p^k}\right)^p\\ &\equiv&\left(1+x^{p^k}\right)^p\\ &\equiv&\binom{p}{0}+\binom{p}{1}x^{p^k}+\binom{p}{2}x^{2p^k}+\cdots+\binom{p}{p-1}x^{(p-1)p^k}+\binom{p}{p}x^{p^{k+1}}\\
&\equiv&1+x^{p^{k+1}}\pmod{p}\end{eqnarray*}$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)Proof
Consider . If is the base representation of , then for all and . We then have
&=&[(1+x)^{p^m}]^{n_m}[(1+x)^{p^{m-1}}]^{n_{m-1}}\cdots[(1+x)^p]^{n_1}(1+x)^{n_0}\\ &\equiv&(1+x^{p^m})^{n_m}(1+x^{p^{m-1}})^{n_{m-1}}\cdots(1+x^p)^{n_1}(1+x)^{n_0}\pmod{p}
\end{eqnarray*}$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)We want the coefficient of in . Since , we want the coefficient of .
The coefficient of each comes from the binomial expansion of , which is . Therefore we take the product of all such , and thus we have
Note that .
This is equivalent to saying that there is no term in the expansion of .