Difference between revisions of "Holomorphic function"
m (Holomorphic moved to Holomorphic function: We're talking about holomorphic functions, right? We could have a "holomorphic function" page that redirects to this, but I think it's more logical this way.) |
(added stuff about Cauchy-Riemann equations) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | A '''holomorphic''' | + | A '''holomorphic function''' <math>f: \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}</math> is a |
+ | differentiable [[complex number|complex]] [[function]]. That is, just | ||
+ | as in the [[real number|real]] case, <math>f</math> is holomorphic at <math>z</math> if | ||
+ | <math>\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}</math> exists. This is much stronger | ||
+ | than in the real case since we must allow <math>h</math> to approach zero from | ||
+ | any direction in the [[complex plane]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Usually, we speak of functions as holomorphic on (open) sets, | ||
+ | rather than at points, for when we consider the behavior of a function | ||
+ | at a point, we prefer to consider it in the context of the points | ||
+ | nearby. | ||
== Cauchy-Riemann Equations == | == Cauchy-Riemann Equations == | ||
− | + | We can obtain an equivalent definition if we break <math>f</math> and <math>z</math> | |
− | * < | + | into real and imaginary components. |
− | * <math>\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}</math> | + | |
+ | Specifically, let <math>u, v : \mathbb{R \times R \to R}</math> be definted | ||
+ | by | ||
+ | <cmath> u(x,y) = \text{Re}\,f(x+iy), \qquad v(x,y) = \text{Im}\,f(x+iy) . </cmath> | ||
+ | If <math>z = x+iy</math>, then | ||
+ | <cmath> f(z) = u(x,y) + i v(x,y). </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | It turns out that we can express the idea "<math>f</math> is holomorphic" | ||
+ | entirely in terms of partial derivatives of <math>u</math> and <math>v</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Theorem.''' Let <math>D</math> be an open, connected subset of <math>\mathbb{C}</math>. | ||
+ | Let us abbreviate <math>x = \text{Re}\, z</math> and <math>y = \text{Im}\, z</math>. | ||
+ | Then the function <math>f</math> is holomorphic on <math>D</math> | ||
+ | if and only if all the partial derivatives of <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> with respect | ||
+ | to <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> are continuous on <math>D</math>, and the following system holds | ||
+ | for every point <math>z \in D</math>: | ||
+ | <cmath> \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} &= \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} ,\\ | ||
+ | \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} &= -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}. | ||
+ | \end{align*} </cmath> | ||
+ | These equations are called the '''[[Cauchy-Riemann Equations]]'''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For convenience, we may abbreviate | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} | ||
+ | + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}, \qquad | ||
+ | \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + | ||
+ | i \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} . </cmath> | ||
+ | With this abuse of notation, we may rewrite the Cauchy-Riemann | ||
+ | equations thus: | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} . </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''Proof of theorem.'' First, suppose that <math>f</math> is | ||
+ | complex-differentiable at <math>z</math>. Then at <math>z</math>, | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+ih)-f(z)}{h} | ||
+ | &= i \cdot \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+ih) - f(z)}{ih} \\ | ||
+ | &= i \cdot f'(z) \\ | ||
+ | &= i \cdot \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h} | ||
+ | = i \cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} . </cmath> | ||
+ | Breaking <math>f</math> into real and imaginary components, we see | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} | ||
+ | = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} | ||
+ | = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} + i \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}. </cmath> | ||
+ | Setting real and imaginary components equal, we obtain the | ||
+ | Cauchy-Riemann equations. It follows from the | ||
+ | [[Cauchy Integral Formula]] that the second derivative of <math>f</math> exists | ||
+ | at <math>z</math>; thus the derivative of <math>f</math> is continuous at <math>z</math>, and so | ||
+ | are the partial derivatives of <math>u</math> and <math>v</math>. | ||
− | + | Now, suppose the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold a point <math>z</math>, and | |
+ | that the partial derivatives of <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> exist and are continuous | ||
+ | in a [[neighborhood]] of <math>z</math>. Let <math>h = h_1 + i h_2</math> be an arbitrarily | ||
+ | small complex number, with <math>h_1, h_2 \in \mathbb{R}</math>. Then | ||
+ | <cmath> \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \frac{f(z + h) - f(z)}{h} &= \frac{f(z+h_1+ih_2)-f(z+h_1)}{h_1+ih_2} | ||
+ | + \frac{f(z+h_1)-f(z)}{h_1+ih_2} \\ | ||
+ | &\approx \frac{ih_2}{h_1+ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(z+h_1) | ||
+ | + \frac{h_1}{h_1 + ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(z) \\ | ||
+ | &\approx \frac{ih_2}{h_1+ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(z) | ||
+ | + \frac{h_1}{h_1 + ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(z) , | ||
+ | \end{align*} </cmath> | ||
+ | with the first approximation from the definition of the partial derivatives | ||
+ | and the second from the continuity of the partial derivatives. | ||
+ | We may force <math>h</math> to be small enough that both approximations | ||
+ | are arbitrarily accurate. Now, by the Cauchy-Riemann equations, | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{i h_2}{h_1+ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(z) | ||
+ | + \frac{h_1}{h_1 + ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(z) | ||
+ | = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} (z) .</cmath> | ||
+ | Therefore | ||
+ | <cmath> \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} | ||
+ | (z) . </cmath> | ||
+ | In particular, the limit exists, so <math>f</math> is differentiable at <math>z</math>. | ||
+ | Since <math>z</math> was arbitrary, it follows that <math>f</math> is differentiable | ||
+ | everywhere in <math>D</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
== Analytic Functions == | == Analytic Functions == | ||
− | A related notion to that of homolorphicity is that of analyticity. A function <math>f:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}</math> is said to be '''analytic''' at <math>z</math> if <math>f</math> has a convergent [[power series]] expansion on some [[neighborhood]] of <math>z</math>. Amazingly, it turns out that a function is holomorphic at <math>z</math> if and only if it is analytic at <math>z</math>. | + | A related notion to that of homolorphicity is that of analyticity. A |
+ | function <math>f:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}</math> is said to be '''analytic''' at | ||
+ | <math>z</math> if <math>f</math> has a convergent [[power series]] expansion on some | ||
+ | [[neighborhood]] of <math>z</math>. Amazingly, it turns out that a function is | ||
+ | holomorphic at <math>z</math> if and only if it is analytic at <math>z</math>. | ||
[[Category:Complex analysis]] | [[Category:Complex analysis]] |
Revision as of 23:16, 6 April 2009
A holomorphic function is a differentiable complex function. That is, just as in the real case, is holomorphic at if exists. This is much stronger than in the real case since we must allow to approach zero from any direction in the complex plane.
Usually, we speak of functions as holomorphic on (open) sets, rather than at points, for when we consider the behavior of a function at a point, we prefer to consider it in the context of the points nearby.
Cauchy-Riemann Equations
We can obtain an equivalent definition if we break and into real and imaginary components.
Specifically, let be definted by If , then
It turns out that we can express the idea " is holomorphic" entirely in terms of partial derivatives of and .
Theorem. Let be an open, connected subset of . Let us abbreviate and . Then the function is holomorphic on if and only if all the partial derivatives of and with respect to and are continuous on , and the following system holds for every point : These equations are called the Cauchy-Riemann Equations.
For convenience, we may abbreviate With this abuse of notation, we may rewrite the Cauchy-Riemann equations thus:
Proof of theorem. First, suppose that is complex-differentiable at . Then at ,
\begin{align*} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+ih)-f(z)}{h} &= i \cdot \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+ih) - f(z)}{ih} \\ &= i \cdot f'(z) \\ &= i \cdot \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h} = i \cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} . (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)
Breaking into real and imaginary components, we see Setting real and imaginary components equal, we obtain the Cauchy-Riemann equations. It follows from the Cauchy Integral Formula that the second derivative of exists at ; thus the derivative of is continuous at , and so are the partial derivatives of and .
Now, suppose the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold a point , and that the partial derivatives of and exist and are continuous in a neighborhood of . Let be an arbitrarily small complex number, with . Then with the first approximation from the definition of the partial derivatives and the second from the continuity of the partial derivatives. We may force to be small enough that both approximations are arbitrarily accurate. Now, by the Cauchy-Riemann equations, Therefore In particular, the limit exists, so is differentiable at . Since was arbitrary, it follows that is differentiable everywhere in .
Analytic Functions
A related notion to that of homolorphicity is that of analyticity. A function is said to be analytic at if has a convergent power series expansion on some neighborhood of . Amazingly, it turns out that a function is holomorphic at if and only if it is analytic at .