Difference between revisions of "Mock USAMO by probability1.01 dropped problems"
(→Problem 2) |
(→Problem 2) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
at <math>N</math>, prove that <math>MN, EF, and BC</math> concur. | at <math>N</math>, prove that <math>MN, EF, and BC</math> concur. | ||
''Reason: The whole incircle business seemed rather artificial. Besides, it wasn’t that difficult.'' | ''Reason: The whole incircle business seemed rather artificial. Besides, it wasn’t that difficult.'' | ||
+ | |||
[[Image:Mock_usamo.png]] | [[Image:Mock_usamo.png]] | ||
+ | |||
[[Mock USAMO by probability1.01 dropped problems/Problem 2|Solution]] | [[Mock USAMO by probability1.01 dropped problems/Problem 2|Solution]] | ||
Revision as of 15:45, 2 September 2006
Problem 1
Problem 2
In triangle , , let the incircle touch , , and at , , and respectively. Let be a point on on the opposite side of from . If and meet at , and and meet at , prove that concur. Reason: The whole incircle business seemed rather artificial. Besides, it wasn’t that difficult.