|
|
| (32 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Ceva's Theorem''' is a criterion for the [[concurrence]] of [[cevian]]s in a [[triangle]].
| + | #REDIRECT[[Ceva's theorem]] |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | == Statement ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Let <math> \displaystyle ABC </math> be a triangle, and let <math> \displaystyle D, E, F </math> be points on lines <math> \displaystyle BC, CA, AB </math>, respectively. Lines <math> \displaystyle AD, BE, CF </math> [[concur]] iff if and only if
| |
| − | <br><center>
| |
| − | <math>\frac{BD}{DC} \cdot \frac{CE}{EA}\cdot \frac{AF}{FB} = 1 </math>,
| |
| − | </center><br>
| |
| − | where lengths are [[directed segments | directed]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[Image:Ceva1.PNG|center]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | (Note that the cevians do not necessarily lie within the triangle, although they do in this diagram.)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Proof ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | We will use the notation <math> \displaystyle [ABC] </math> to denote the area of a triangle with vertices <math> \displaystyle A,B,C </math>.
| |
| − | | |
| − | First, suppose <math> \displaystyle AD, BE, CF </math> meet at a point <math> \displaystyle X </math>. We note that triangles <math> \displaystyle ABD, ADC </math> have the same altitude to line <math> \displaystyle BC </math>, but bases <math> \displaystyle BD </math> and <math> \displaystyle DC </math>. It follows that <math> \frac {BD}{DC} = \frac{[ABD]}{[ADC]} </math>. The same is true for triangles <math> \displaystyle XBD, XDC </math>, so
| |
| − | <center><math> \frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{[ABD]}{[ADC]} = \frac{[XBD]}{[XDC]} = \frac{[ABD]- [XBD]}{[ADC]-[XDC]} = \frac{[ABX]}{[AXC]} </math>. </center>
| |
| − | Similarly, <math> \frac{CE}{EA} = \frac{[BCX]}{[BXA]} </math> and <math> \frac{AF}{FB} = \frac{[CAX]}{[CXB]} </math>,
| |
| − | so
| |
| − | <center>
| |
| − | <math> \frac{BD}{DC} \cdot \frac{CE}{EA} \cdot \frac{AF}{FB} = \frac{[ABX]}{[AXC]} \cdot \frac{[BCX]}{[BXA]} \cdot \frac{[CAX]}{[CXB]} = 1 </math>.
| |
| − | </center>
| |
| − | | |
| − | Now, suppose <math> \displaystyle D, E,F </math> satisfy Ceva's criterion, and suppose <math> \displaystyle AD, BE </math> intersect at <math> \displaystyle X </math>. Suppose the line <math> \displaystyle CX </math> intersects line <math> \displaystyle AB </math> at <math> \displaystyle F' </math>. We have proven that <math> \displaystyle F' </math> must satisfy Ceva's criterion. This means that <center><math> \frac{AF'}{F'B} = \frac{AF}{FB} </math>, </center> so <center><math> \displaystyle F' = F </math>, </center> and line <math> \displaystyle CF </math> concurrs with <math> \displaystyle AD </math> and <math> \displaystyle BE </math>. {{Halmos}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Trigonometric Form ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | The [[trig | trigonometric]] form of Ceva's Theorem (Trig Ceva) states that cevians <math> \displaystyle AD,BE,CF</math> concur if and only if
| |
| − | <center>
| |
| − | <math> \frac{\sin BAD}{\sin DAC} \cdot \frac{\sin CBE}{\sin EBA} \cdot \frac{\sin ACF}{\sin FCB} = 1.</math>
| |
| − | </center>
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Proof ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | First, suppose <math> \displaystyle AD, BE, CF </math> concur at a point <math> \displaystyle X </math>. We note that
| |
| − | <center>
| |
| − | <math> \frac{[BAX]}{[XAC]} = \frac{ \frac{1}{2}AB \cdot AX \cdot \sin BAX}{ \frac{1}{2}AX \cdot AC \cdot \sin XAC} = \frac{AB \cdot \sin BAD}{AC \cdot \sin DAC} </math>, </center>
| |
| − | and similarly,
| |
| − | <center>
| |
| − | <math> \frac{[CBX]}{[XBA]} = \frac{AB \cdot \sin BAD}{AC \cdot \sin DAC} ;\; \frac{[ACX]}{[XCB]} = \frac{CA \cdot \sin ACF}{CB \cdot \sin FCB} </math>. </center>
| |
| − | It follows that
| |
| − | <center>
| |
| − | <math> \frac{\sin BAD}{\sin DAC} \cdot \frac{\sin CBE}{\sin EBA} \cdot \frac{\sin ACF}{\sin FCB} = \frac{AB \cdot \sin BAD}{AC \cdot \sin DAC} \cdot \frac{AB \cdot \sin BAD}{AC \cdot \sin DAC} \cdot \frac{CA \cdot \sin ACF}{CB \cdot \sin FCB} </math> <br> <br> <math> \qquad = \frac{[BAX]}{[XAC]} \cdot \frac{[CBX]}{[XBA]} \cdot \frac{[ACX]}{[XCB]} = 1 </math>.
| |
| − | </center>
| |
| − | | |
| − | The converse follows by an argument almost identical to that used for the first form of Ceva's Theorem. {{Halmos}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Examples ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | # Suppose AB, AC, and BC have lengths 13, 14, and 15. If <math>\frac{AF}{FB} = \frac{2}{5}</math> and <math>\frac{CE}{EA} = \frac{5}{8}</math>. Find BD and DC.<br> <br> If <math>BD = x</math> and <math>DC = y</math>, then <math>10x = 40y</math>, and <math>{x + y = 15}</math>. From this, we find <math>x = 12</math> and <math>y = 3</math>.
| |
| − | # The concurrence of the altitudes of a triangle at the [[orthocenter]] and the concurrence of the perpendicual bisectors of a triangle at the [[circumcenter]] can both be proven by Ceva's Theorem (the latter is a little harder). Furthermore, the existance of the [[centroid]] can be shown by Ceva, and the existance of the [[incenter]] can be shown using trig Ceva. However, there are more elegant methods for proving each of these results, and in any case, any result obtained by classic Ceva's Theorem can be proven using ratios of areas. | |
| − | # The existance of [[isotonic conjugate]]s can be shown by classic Ceva, and the existance of [[isogonal conjugate]]s can be shown by trig Ceva.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == See also ==
| |
| − | * [[Menelaus' Theorem]]
| |
