Difference between revisions of "2016 AIME II Problems/Problem 9"
Dankster42 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 4 (More Robust Bash)) |
m (→Solution 2 (No trial and error)) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Since all the terms of the sequences are integers, and 100 isn't very big, we should just try out the possibilities for <math>b_2</math>. When we get to <math>b_2=9</math> and <math>a_2=91</math>, we have <math>a_4=271</math> and <math>b_4=729</math>, which works, therefore, the answer is <math>b_3+a_3=81+181=\boxed{262}</math>. | Since all the terms of the sequences are integers, and 100 isn't very big, we should just try out the possibilities for <math>b_2</math>. When we get to <math>b_2=9</math> and <math>a_2=91</math>, we have <math>a_4=271</math> and <math>b_4=729</math>, which works, therefore, the answer is <math>b_3+a_3=81+181=\boxed{262}</math>. | ||
− | == Solution 2 ( | + | == Solution 2 (Some trial and error)== |
We have <math>a_k=r^{k-1}</math> and <math>b_k=(k-1)d</math>. First, <math>b_{k-1}<c_{k-1}=100</math> implies <math>d<100</math>, so <math>b_{k+1}<300</math>. | We have <math>a_k=r^{k-1}</math> and <math>b_k=(k-1)d</math>. First, <math>b_{k-1}<c_{k-1}=100</math> implies <math>d<100</math>, so <math>b_{k+1}<300</math>. | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Because very small integers for <math>n</math> yield very big results, we can bash through all cases of <math>n</math>. Here, we set an upper bound for <math>n</math> by setting <math>k</math> as 3. After trying values, we find that <math>n\leq 4</math>, so <math>b=9, 7, 5, 3</math>. Testing out <math>b=9</math> yields the correct answer of <math>\boxed{262}</math>. Note that even if this answer were associated with another b value like <math>b=3</math>, the value of <math>k</math> can still only be 3 for all of the cases. | Because very small integers for <math>n</math> yield very big results, we can bash through all cases of <math>n</math>. Here, we set an upper bound for <math>n</math> by setting <math>k</math> as 3. After trying values, we find that <math>n\leq 4</math>, so <math>b=9, 7, 5, 3</math>. Testing out <math>b=9</math> yields the correct answer of <math>\boxed{262}</math>. Note that even if this answer were associated with another b value like <math>b=3</math>, the value of <math>k</math> can still only be 3 for all of the cases. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 5 (Casework)== | ||
+ | Let <math>a_n</math> and <math>b_n </math> be in the form of | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{array}[b]{ c c c c c c c } | ||
+ | n & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\[2ex] | ||
+ | a_n & 1 & a+1 & 2a+1 & 3a+1 & 4a+1 & 5a+1 \\[2ex] | ||
+ | b_n & 1 & b & b^2 & b^3 & b^4 & b^5 \\[2ex] | ||
+ | c_n & 2 & b+a+1 & b^2+2a+1 & b^3+3a+1 & b^4+4a+1 & b^5+5a+1 | ||
+ | \end{array} </cmath> | ||
+ | Case <math>1.\hspace{10mm} k = 3\hspace{5mm} (c_1=2 \implies k > 2).</math> | ||
+ | <cmath>c_2 = a+1 + b = 100, c_4 = 3a+1 + b^3 = 1000 \implies b^3 -3b -2 = 1000-300 \implies b^3 - 3b = 702 \implies b = 9, a=90, c_3 = \boxed {262}.</cmath> | ||
+ | Case <math>2. \hspace{10mm} k = 4.</math> | ||
+ | <cmath>c_3 = 2a+1 + b^2 = 100, c_5 = 4a+1 + b^4 = 1000 \implies b^4 -2b^2 -1 = 1000-200 \implies b^4 - 2b^2 = 801 \implies \O.</cmath> | ||
+ | Case <math>3. \hspace{10mm} k \ge 5.\hspace{3mm} b^5 < 1000 \implies b = \{2,3\}.</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Case <math>3.1.\hspace{10mm} b = 2.</math> | ||
+ | <cmath>c_{k-1} = 2^{k-2} + (k-2) a + 1 = 100, c_{k+1} = 2^k + ka + 1 = 1000\implies a = 450-3\cdot 2^{k-3} \implies 2^k +450k -3k\cdot 2^{k-3} + 1 = 1000 \implies \O.</cmath> | ||
+ | Case <math>3.2.\hspace{10mm} b = 3.</math> | ||
+ | <cmath>c_{k-1} = 3^{k-2} + (k-2) a + 1 = 100, c_{k+1} = 3^k + ka + 1 = 1000\implies a = 450-4\cdot 3^{k-2} \implies 3^{k-4}(9-4k) +50k = 3\cdot 37 \implies \O.</cmath> | ||
+ | '''vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss''' | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{AIME box|year=2016|n=II|num-b=8|num-a=10}} | {{AIME box|year=2016|n=II|num-b=8|num-a=10}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 00:18, 2 February 2023
Contents
Problem
The sequences of positive integers and are an increasing arithmetic sequence and an increasing geometric sequence, respectively. Let . There is an integer such that and . Find .
Solution 1
Since all the terms of the sequences are integers, and 100 isn't very big, we should just try out the possibilities for . When we get to and , we have and , which works, therefore, the answer is .
Solution 2 (Some trial and error)
We have and . First, implies , so .
It follows that , i.e., Moreover, since is atleast we get , i.e. . For every value of in this range, define , and define . We are looking for values of such that . Let's make a table: The only admissible values for are . However, since , we must have . This does not hold for because does not divide . This leaves as the only option.
For and , we check: implies , i.e. . Then and and ; so it works! Then .
Solution 3
Using the same reasoning ( isn't very big), we can guess which terms will work. The first case is , so we assume the second and fourth terms of are and . We let be the common ratio of the geometric sequence and write the arithmetic relationships in terms of .
The common difference is , and so we can equate: . Moving all the terms to one side and the constants to the other yields
, or . Simply listing out the factors of shows that the only factor less than a square that works is . Thus and we solve from there to get .
Solution by rocketscience
Solution 4 (More Robust Bash)
The reason for bashing in this context can also be justified by the fact 100 isn't very big.
Let the common difference for the arithmetic sequence be , and the common ratio for the geometric sequence be . The sequences are now , and . We can now write the given two equations as the following:
Take the difference between the two equations to get . Since 900 is divisible by 4, we can tell is even and is odd. Let , , where and are positive integers. Substitute variables and divide by 4 to get:
Because very small integers for yield very big results, we can bash through all cases of . Here, we set an upper bound for by setting as 3. After trying values, we find that , so . Testing out yields the correct answer of . Note that even if this answer were associated with another b value like , the value of can still only be 3 for all of the cases.
Solution 5 (Casework)
Let and be in the form of Case Case Case
Case Case vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss
See also
2016 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 8 |
Followed by Problem 10 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.