Difference between revisions of "1966 IMO Problems/Problem 5"
m |
m |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<math>\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |a_1 - a_2| x_2 + |a_1 - a_3| x_3 + |a_1 - a_4| x_4 = 1 \\ | <math>\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |a_1 - a_2| x_2 + |a_1 - a_3| x_3 + |a_1 - a_4| x_4 = 1 \\ | ||
|a_2 - a_1| x_1 + \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |a_2 - a_3| x_3 + |a_2 - a_4| x_4 = 1 \\ | |a_2 - a_1| x_1 + \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |a_2 - a_3| x_3 + |a_2 - a_4| x_4 = 1 \\ | ||
− | |a_3 - a_1| x_1 + |a_3 - a_2| x_2 + \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |a_3-a_4| x_4 = 1 \\ | + | |a_3 - a_1| x_1 + |a_3 - a_2| x_2 + \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |a_3 - a_4| x_4 = 1 \\ |
|a_4 - a_1| x_1 + |a_4 - a_2| x_2 + |a_4 - a_3| x_3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ = 1</math> | |a_4 - a_1| x_1 + |a_4 - a_2| x_2 + |a_4 - a_3| x_3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ = 1</math> | ||
where <math>a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4</math> are four different real numbers. | where <math>a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4</math> are four different real numbers. | ||
+ | |||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
Hence <math>x2 = x3 = 0</math>, and <math>x1 = x4 = 1/(a1 - a4)</math>. | Hence <math>x2 = x3 = 0</math>, and <math>x1 = x4 = 1/(a1 - a4)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The solution above is in the realm of flawed and incorrect. | ||
+ | It is flawed because you can not claim to have solved a | ||
+ | system of equations by having solved a particular case. | ||
+ | It is correct in solving the particular case, but it is | ||
+ | incorrect in stating that the result obtained is a solution | ||
+ | to the system in general. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Below I will give a complete solution to the problem. The | ||
+ | first few lines will be a repetition of the "solution" above, | ||
+ | and I will repeat them for the sake of completeness and of a | ||
+ | more tidy writing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are 24 possibilities when we count the ordering of | ||
+ | <math>a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4</math>, and each ordering gives a different | ||
+ | system of equations. Let us consider one of them, like | ||
+ | in the "solution" above. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Assume <math>a_1 > a_2 > a_3 > a_4</math>. In this case, the system is | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (a_1 - a_2) x_2 + (a_1 - a_3) x_3 + (a_1 - a_4) x_4 = 1 \\ | ||
+ | (a_1 - a_2) x_1 + \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (a_2 - a_3) x_3 + (a_2 - a_4) x_4 = 1 \\ | ||
+ | (a_1 - a_3) x_1 + (a_2 - a_3) x_2 + \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (a_3 - a_4) x_4 = 1 \\ | ||
+ | (a_1 - a_4) x_1 + (a_2 - a_4) x_2 + (a_3 - a_4) x_3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ = 1</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Subtract the second equation from the first, and divide by | ||
+ | <math>(a_1 - a_2)</math>. Also, subtract the fourth equation from the | ||
+ | third, and divide by <math>(a_3 - a_4)</math>. We obtain | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>-x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 = 0 \\ | ||
+ | -x_1 - x_2 - x_3 + x_4 = 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | It follows that <math>x_1 - x_4 = 0</math> and <math>x_2 + x_3 = 0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Subtract the third equation from the second, and divide by | ||
+ | <math>(a_2 - a_3)</math>. We obtain | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>-x_1 - x_2 + x_3 + x_4 = 0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>x_1 - x_4 = 0</math>, it follows that <math>x_2 - x_3 = 0</math>. | ||
+ | Combining with <math>x_2 + x_3 = 0</math>, we get <math>x_2 = x_3 = 0</math>. | ||
+ | Replacing these in the first equation of the system, we | ||
+ | get <math>x_4 = \frac{1}{a_1 - a_4}</math>, so we also have | ||
+ | <math>x_1 = \frac{1}{a_1 - a_4}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now we have two ways of proceeding. We could consider each | ||
+ | of the other 23 cases, and solve it by a similar method. | ||
+ | The task is made easy if we notice that each case is obtained | ||
+ | from the first case by a permutation of indices, so it can be | ||
+ | viewed as a change of notation. With some care, we can just | ||
+ | write the solution in each case. For example, in the case | ||
+ | <math>a_2 > a_1 > a_3 > a_4</math>, we will obtain <math>x_1 = x_3 = 0</math> | ||
+ | and <math>x_2 = x_4 = \frac{1}{a_2 - a_4}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will proceed differently, but we will use the same idea. | ||
+ | Let <math>m, n, p, q</math> be the indices such that | ||
+ | <math>a_m > a_n > a_p > a_q</math>. Written in a compact way, our | ||
+ | system becomes | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\sum_{\substack{i = 1 \\ i \ne j}}^4 |a_j - a_i| x_i = 1, \ \ \ \ j = 1, 2, 3, 4</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Make the following change of notation: | ||
+ | <math>a_m \rightarrow b_1 \\ | ||
+ | a_n \rightarrow b_2 \\ | ||
+ | a_p \rightarrow b_3 \\ | ||
+ | a_q \rightarrow b_4</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | and | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>x_m \rightarrow y_1 \\ | ||
+ | x_n \rightarrow y_2 \\ | ||
+ | x_p \rightarrow y_3 \\ | ||
+ | x_q \rightarrow y_4</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the new notation we have <math>b_1 > b_2 > b_3 > b_4</math> and | ||
+ | the system becomes | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\sum_{\substack{k = 1 \\ k \ne l}}^4 |b_l - b_k| y_k = 1, \ \ \ \ l = 1, 2, 3, 4</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is exactly the system we solved above, just with a | ||
+ | new notation (<math>b, y</math> instead of <math>a, x</math>). So the solutions | ||
+ | are <math>y_2 = y_3 = 0, y_1 = y_4 = \frac{1}{b_1 - b_4}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Returning to our original notation, we have | ||
+ | <math>x_n = x_p = 0, x_m, x_q = \frac{1}{a_m - a_q}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In conclusion, here is a compact way of giving the solution | ||
+ | to the system: let <math>m</math> be the index of the largest of the | ||
+ | <math>a_i</math>'s, and q = the index of the smallest of the <math>a_i</math>'s, | ||
+ | and let <math>n, p</math> be the other two indices. Then | ||
+ | <math>x_n = x_p = 0, x_m, x_q = \frac{1}{a_m - a_q}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [Solution by pf02, September 2024] | ||
+ | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{IMO box|year=1966|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | {{IMO box|year=1966|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | ||
[[Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems]] | [[Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems]] |
Latest revision as of 18:12, 10 November 2024
Problem
Solve the system of equations
where are four different real numbers.
Solution
Take a1 > a2 > a3 > a4. Subtracting the equation for i=2 from that for i=1 and dividing by (a1 - a2) we get:
Subtracting the equation for i=4 from that for i=3 and dividing by (a3 - a4) we get:
Hence x1 = x4. Subtracting the equation for i=3 from that for i=2 and dividing by (a2 - a3) we get:
Hence , and .
Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)
The solution above is in the realm of flawed and incorrect. It is flawed because you can not claim to have solved a system of equations by having solved a particular case. It is correct in solving the particular case, but it is incorrect in stating that the result obtained is a solution to the system in general.
Below I will give a complete solution to the problem. The first few lines will be a repetition of the "solution" above, and I will repeat them for the sake of completeness and of a more tidy writing.
Solution 2
There are 24 possibilities when we count the ordering of , and each ordering gives a different system of equations. Let us consider one of them, like in the "solution" above.
Assume . In this case, the system is
Subtract the second equation from the first, and divide by . Also, subtract the fourth equation from the third, and divide by . We obtain
It follows that and .
Subtract the third equation from the second, and divide by . We obtain
Since , it follows that . Combining with , we get . Replacing these in the first equation of the system, we get , so we also have .
Now we have two ways of proceeding. We could consider each of the other 23 cases, and solve it by a similar method. The task is made easy if we notice that each case is obtained from the first case by a permutation of indices, so it can be viewed as a change of notation. With some care, we can just write the solution in each case. For example, in the case , we will obtain and .
We will proceed differently, but we will use the same idea. Let be the indices such that . Written in a compact way, our system becomes
.
Make the following change of notation:
and
In the new notation we have and the system becomes
.
This is exactly the system we solved above, just with a new notation ( instead of ). So the solutions are .
Returning to our original notation, we have .
In conclusion, here is a compact way of giving the solution to the system: let be the index of the largest of the 's, and q = the index of the smallest of the 's, and let be the other two indices. Then .
[Solution by pf02, September 2024]
See also
1966 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 6 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |