Difference between revisions of "1966 IMO Problems/Problem 5"
m |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
-x_1 - x_2 - x_3 + x_4 = 0</math> | -x_1 - x_2 - x_3 + x_4 = 0</math> | ||
− | It follows <math>x_1 - x_4 = 0</math> and <math>x_2 + x_3 = 0</math>. | + | It follows that <math>x_1 - x_4 = 0</math> and <math>x_2 + x_3 = 0</math>. |
Subtract the third equation from the second, and divide by | Subtract the third equation from the second, and divide by | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
Now we have two ways of proceeding. We could consider each | Now we have two ways of proceeding. We could consider each | ||
of the other 23 cases, and solve it by a similar method. | of the other 23 cases, and solve it by a similar method. | ||
− | The task is made easy if we notice that each case is | + | The task is made easy if we notice that each case is obtained |
− | a permutation of indices, so it can be viewed as a change | + | from the first case by a permutation of indices, so it can be |
− | of notation | + | viewed as a change of notation. With some care, we can just |
− | solution in each case. For example, in the case | + | write the solution in each case. For example, in the case |
<math>a_2 > a_1 > a_3 > a_4</math>, we will obtain <math>x_1 = x_3 = 0</math> | <math>a_2 > a_1 > a_3 > a_4</math>, we will obtain <math>x_1 = x_3 = 0</math> | ||
and <math>x_2 = x_4 = \frac{1}{a_2 - a_4}</math>. | and <math>x_2 = x_4 = \frac{1}{a_2 - a_4}</math>. | ||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
<math>x_n = x_p = 0, x_m, x_q = \frac{1}{a_m - a_q}</math>. | <math>x_n = x_p = 0, x_m, x_q = \frac{1}{a_m - a_q}</math>. | ||
− | + | [Solution by pf02, September 2024] | |
Latest revision as of 18:12, 10 November 2024
Problem
Solve the system of equations
where are four different real numbers.
Solution
Take a1 > a2 > a3 > a4. Subtracting the equation for i=2 from that for i=1 and dividing by (a1 - a2) we get:
Subtracting the equation for i=4 from that for i=3 and dividing by (a3 - a4) we get:
Hence x1 = x4. Subtracting the equation for i=3 from that for i=2 and dividing by (a2 - a3) we get:
Hence , and .
Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)
The solution above is in the realm of flawed and incorrect. It is flawed because you can not claim to have solved a system of equations by having solved a particular case. It is correct in solving the particular case, but it is incorrect in stating that the result obtained is a solution to the system in general.
Below I will give a complete solution to the problem. The first few lines will be a repetition of the "solution" above, and I will repeat them for the sake of completeness and of a more tidy writing.
Solution 2
There are 24 possibilities when we count the ordering of , and each ordering gives a different system of equations. Let us consider one of them, like in the "solution" above.
Assume . In this case, the system is
Subtract the second equation from the first, and divide by . Also, subtract the fourth equation from the third, and divide by . We obtain
It follows that and .
Subtract the third equation from the second, and divide by . We obtain
Since , it follows that . Combining with , we get . Replacing these in the first equation of the system, we get , so we also have .
Now we have two ways of proceeding. We could consider each of the other 23 cases, and solve it by a similar method. The task is made easy if we notice that each case is obtained from the first case by a permutation of indices, so it can be viewed as a change of notation. With some care, we can just write the solution in each case. For example, in the case , we will obtain and .
We will proceed differently, but we will use the same idea. Let be the indices such that . Written in a compact way, our system becomes
.
Make the following change of notation:
and
In the new notation we have and the system becomes
.
This is exactly the system we solved above, just with a new notation ( instead of ). So the solutions are .
Returning to our original notation, we have .
In conclusion, here is a compact way of giving the solution to the system: let be the index of the largest of the 's, and q = the index of the smallest of the 's, and let be the other two indices. Then .
[Solution by pf02, September 2024]
See also
1966 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 6 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |