Difference between revisions of "Fermat point"
m |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The '''Fermat point''' (also called the Torricelli point) of a triangle <math>\triangle ABC</math> is a point <math>P</math> which has the minimum total distance to three [[vertices]] (i.e., <math>AP+BP+CP</math>). | + | The '''Fermat point''' (also called the Torricelli point) of a triangle <math>\triangle ABC</math> (with no angle more than <math>120^{\circ}</math> is a point <math>P</math> which has the minimum total distance to three [[vertices]] (i.e., <math>AP+BP+CP</math>). |
+ | |||
+ | <asy> | ||
+ | pair A=(2,4), B=(1,1), C=(6,1); | ||
+ | pair pAB=rotate(60,B)*A, pCA=rotate(60,A)*C; | ||
+ | path PC=pAB--C, PB=pCA--B; | ||
+ | D(MP("A",A,2N)--MP("B",B,SW)--MP("C",C,SE)--cycle,green); | ||
+ | D(C--pCA--A--pAB--B,red+dashed); | ||
+ | DPA(PC^^PB,lightblue); | ||
+ | D(MP("C'",pAB,NW),orange); | ||
+ | D(MP("B'",pCA,NE),orange); | ||
+ | D(A); D(B); D(C); | ||
+ | D(MP("P",IP(PC,PB),E),blue); | ||
+ | </asy> | ||
==Construction== | ==Construction== | ||
A method to find the point is to construct three equilateral triangles out of the three sides from <math>\triangle ABC</math>, then connect each new vertex to each opposite vertex, as these three lines will concur at first Fermat point. | A method to find the point is to construct three equilateral triangles out of the three sides from <math>\triangle ABC</math>, then connect each new vertex to each opposite vertex, as these three lines will concur at first Fermat point. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Proofs== | ||
+ | We shall present a standard triangle inequality proof as well as a less-known vector proof: | ||
+ | ===Geometric Proof=== | ||
+ | First, we shall note that <math>P</math> must lie inside the triangle <math>\triangle ABC</math>. Otherwise, we suppose that WLOG, <math>P</math> and <math>A</math> are on opposite sides of <math>BC</math>. Then, consider <math>P'</math> the reflection of <math>P</math> about <math>BC</math>. Note <math>PB=P'B</math>, <math>PC=P'C</math>, and <math>PA>P'A</math>, so thus <math>P</math> is not the Fermat Point. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Suppose that <math>\angle A</math> was acute. Consider the <math>60^{\circ}</math> rotation about <math>\angle A</math>. For any point <math>X</math>, let the image of this point be <math>X'</math>. Then, we see that <math>AC=AC'</math> and <math>\angle CAC'=60^{\circ}</math>. so <math>ACC'</math> is equilateral. Now, consider the point <math>P</math> inside the triangle. Then, <math>AP=AP'</math> and <math>\angle PAP'=60^{\circ}</math>, so <math>AP=PP'</math>. Thus, we get that <math>AP+BP+CP=BP+PP'+C'P'</math> as <math>CP=C'P'</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now, WLOG let <math>\angle B\leq\angle C</math>. We have that <math>\angle BCC'\leq 180^{\circ}</math>. We note that <math>AP+BP+CP=BP+PP'+C'P'\geq BC'</math> with equality if and only if <math>P,P'\in BC'</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This means that <math>\angle APC'=60^{\circ}</math> (as then <math>P'\in CP</math>). Thus, we see that <math>APCC'</math> is cyclic, so thus as <math>P</math> lies on <math>BC'</math>, we see that <math>P</math> is the intersection of the circumcircle of <math>ACC'</math> and <math>BC'</math> (not <math>C'</math>). Thus, note that as <math>\angle APC'=\angle CPC'=60^{\circ}</math>, <math>\angle APC=120^{\circ}</math>. Similarly, <math>\angle CPB=180^{\circ}-\angle CPC'=120^{\circ}</math>. Thus, we have found the Fermat Point. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Vector Proof (Due to Titu Andreescu and Oleg Mushkarov)=== | ||
+ | We will let our origin be the point <math>P</math> with <math>\angle APB=\angle BPC=\angle CPA=120^{\circ}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Consider the point in the plane <math>X</math>. Let <math>a=\vec{A},b=\vec{B},c=\vec{C},x=\vec{X}</math> and <math>i,j,k</math> the unit vectors along <math>a,b,c</math>. Then, <math>|a|=a\cdot i=(a-x)\cdot i+x\cdot i\leq |a-x|+x\cdot i</math>. Similarly, <math>|b|=b\cdot j=(b-x)\cdot j+x\cdot j\leq |b-x|+x\cdot j</math> and <math>|c|=c\cdot k=(c-x)\cdot k+x\cdot k\leq |c-x|+x\cdot k</math>. Noting that <math>i+j+k=\vec{0}</math> and adding, we see that <math>|a|+|b|+|c|\leq |a-x|+|b-x|+|c-x|</math>, or <math>AP+BP+CP\leq AX+BX+CX</math>. Thus, the origin or point <math>P</math> is the desired point. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Generalizations== | ||
+ | There are two main generalizations: | ||
+ | ===Weighted Generalization=== | ||
+ | The problem goes as following: which point <math>P</math> minimizes <math>m\cdot AP+n\cdot BP+p\cdot CP</math>, where <math>m,n,p</math> are positive reals? | ||
+ | ===Polygon Generalization=== | ||
+ | The problem goes as following: for the polygon <math>A_1A_2\cdots A_n</math>, which point <math>P</math> minimizes <math>A_1P+A_2P+\cdots+A_nP</math>? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using the second solution, it is easy to see the point is the point <math>P</math> where the unit vectors to the vertices sum to <math>0</math>. For a quadrilateral, it is the intersection of the diagonals. | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== |
Latest revision as of 15:07, 29 December 2019
The Fermat point (also called the Torricelli point) of a triangle (with no angle more than is a point which has the minimum total distance to three vertices (i.e., ).
Contents
Construction
A method to find the point is to construct three equilateral triangles out of the three sides from , then connect each new vertex to each opposite vertex, as these three lines will concur at first Fermat point.
Proofs
We shall present a standard triangle inequality proof as well as a less-known vector proof:
Geometric Proof
First, we shall note that must lie inside the triangle . Otherwise, we suppose that WLOG, and are on opposite sides of . Then, consider the reflection of about . Note , , and , so thus is not the Fermat Point.
Suppose that was acute. Consider the rotation about . For any point , let the image of this point be . Then, we see that and . so is equilateral. Now, consider the point inside the triangle. Then, and , so . Thus, we get that as .
Now, WLOG let . We have that . We note that with equality if and only if .
This means that (as then ). Thus, we see that is cyclic, so thus as lies on , we see that is the intersection of the circumcircle of and (not ). Thus, note that as , . Similarly, . Thus, we have found the Fermat Point.
Vector Proof (Due to Titu Andreescu and Oleg Mushkarov)
We will let our origin be the point with .
Consider the point in the plane . Let and the unit vectors along . Then, . Similarly, and . Noting that and adding, we see that , or . Thus, the origin or point is the desired point.
Generalizations
There are two main generalizations:
Weighted Generalization
The problem goes as following: which point minimizes , where are positive reals?
Polygon Generalization
The problem goes as following: for the polygon , which point minimizes ?
Using the second solution, it is easy to see the point is the point where the unit vectors to the vertices sum to . For a quadrilateral, it is the intersection of the diagonals.
See Also
This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.