Difference between revisions of "2000 AMC 10 Problems/Problem 21"
5849206328x (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Problem== ==Solution== ==See Also== {{AMC10 box|year=2000|num-b=20|num-a=22}}) |
Cool-creeper (talk | contribs) m (→Problem) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Problem== | ==Problem== | ||
− | ==Solution== | + | If all alligators are ferocious creatures and some creepy crawlers are alligators, which statement(s) must be true? |
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\textrm{I. All alligators are creepy crawlers.}</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>\textrm{II. Some ferocious creatures are creepy crawlers.}</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>\textrm{III. Some alligators are not creepy crawlers.}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\mathrm{(A)}\ \text{I only} \qquad\mathrm{(B)}\ \text{II only} \qquad\mathrm{(C)}\ \text{III only} \qquad\mathrm{(D)}\ \text{II and III only} \qquad\mathrm{(E)}\ \text{None must be true}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution == | ||
+ | |||
+ | We interpret the problem statement as a query about three abstract concepts denoted as "alligators", "creepy crawlers" and "ferocious creatures". In answering the question, we may NOT refer to reality -- for example to the fact that alligators do exist. | ||
+ | |||
+ | To make more clear that we are not using anything outside the problem statement, let's rename the three concepts as <math>A</math>, <math>C</math>, and <math>F</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We got the following information: | ||
+ | * If <math>x</math> is an <math>A</math>, then <math>x</math> is an <math>F</math>. | ||
+ | * There is some <math>x</math> that is a <math>C</math> and at the same time an <math>A</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We CAN NOT conclude that the first statement is true. For example, the situation "Johnny and Freddy are <math>A</math>s, but only Johnny is a <math>C</math>" meets both conditions, but the first statement is false. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We CAN conclude that the second statement is true. We know that there is some <math>x</math> that is a <math>C</math> and at the same time an <math>A</math>. Pick one such <math>x</math> and call it Bobby. Additionally, we know that if <math>x</math> is an <math>A</math>, then <math>x</math> is an <math>F</math>. Bobby is an <math>A</math>, therefore Bobby is an <math>F</math>. And this is enough to prove the second statement -- Bobby is an <math>F</math> that is also a <math>C</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We CAN NOT conclude that the third statement is true. For example, consider the situation when <math>A</math>, <math>C</math> and <math>F</math> are equivalent (represent the same set of objects). In such case both conditions are satisfied, but the third statement is false. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore the answer is <math>\boxed{\text{(B) \, II only}}</math>. | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{AMC10 box|year=2000|num-b=20|num-a=22}} | {{AMC10 box|year=2000|num-b=20|num-a=22}} | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 03:13, 1 February 2024
Problem
If all alligators are ferocious creatures and some creepy crawlers are alligators, which statement(s) must be true?
Solution
We interpret the problem statement as a query about three abstract concepts denoted as "alligators", "creepy crawlers" and "ferocious creatures". In answering the question, we may NOT refer to reality -- for example to the fact that alligators do exist.
To make more clear that we are not using anything outside the problem statement, let's rename the three concepts as , , and .
We got the following information:
- If is an , then is an .
- There is some that is a and at the same time an .
We CAN NOT conclude that the first statement is true. For example, the situation "Johnny and Freddy are s, but only Johnny is a " meets both conditions, but the first statement is false.
We CAN conclude that the second statement is true. We know that there is some that is a and at the same time an . Pick one such and call it Bobby. Additionally, we know that if is an , then is an . Bobby is an , therefore Bobby is an . And this is enough to prove the second statement -- Bobby is an that is also a .
We CAN NOT conclude that the third statement is true. For example, consider the situation when , and are equivalent (represent the same set of objects). In such case both conditions are satisfied, but the third statement is false.
Therefore the answer is .
See Also
2000 AMC 10 (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 20 |
Followed by Problem 22 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.