Difference between revisions of "Divisor function"
5849206328x (talk | contribs) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The '''divisor function''' is denoted <math>\sigma_k(n)</math> and is defined as the sum of the <math>k</math>th [[power]]s of the [[divisor]]s of <math>n</math>. Thus <math>\sigma_k(n) = \sum_{d|n}d^k = d_1 + d_2 + \cdots + d_r</math> where the <math>d_i</math> are the divisors of <math>n</math>. | + | The '''divisor function''' is denoted <math>\sigma_k(n)</math> and is defined as the sum of the <math>k</math>th [[power]]s of the [[divisor]]s of <math>n</math>. Thus <math>\sigma_k(n) = \sum_{d|n}d^k = d_1^k + d_2^k + \cdots + d_r^k</math> where the <math>d_i</math> are the [[positive]] divisors of <math>n</math>. |
== Counting divisors == | == Counting divisors == | ||
− | + | Note that <math>\sigma_0(n) = d_1^0 + d_2^0 + \ldots + d_r^0 = 1 + 1 + \ldots + 1 = r</math>, the number of divisors of <math>n</math>. Thus <math>\sigma_0(n) = d(n)</math> is simply the number of divisors of <math>n</math>. | |
− | === Example === | + | === Example Problems === |
+ | ==== Demonstration ==== | ||
Consider the task of counting the divisors of 72. | Consider the task of counting the divisors of 72. | ||
− | :First, we find the [[prime factorization]] of 72: <math> | + | :First, we find the [[prime factorization]] of 72: <math>72=2^{3} \cdot 3^{2}.</math> |
:Since each divisor of 72 can have a power of 2, and since this power can be 0, 1, 2, or 3, we have 4 possibilities. Likewise, since each divisor can have a power of 3, and since this power can be 0, 1, or 2, we have 3 possibilities. By an elementary [[counting]] principle, we have <math>3\cdot 4=12</math> divisors. | :Since each divisor of 72 can have a power of 2, and since this power can be 0, 1, 2, or 3, we have 4 possibilities. Likewise, since each divisor can have a power of 3, and since this power can be 0, 1, or 2, we have 3 possibilities. By an elementary [[counting]] principle, we have <math>3\cdot 4=12</math> divisors. | ||
− | We can now generalize. Let the prime factorization of <math>n</math> be <math>p_1^{e_1}p_2^{e_2}\cdots p_k^{e_k}</math>. Any divisor of <math>n</math> must be of the form <math>p_1^{f_1}p_2^{f_2} \cdots p_k^{e_k}</math> where the <math> | + | We can now generalize. Let the prime factorization of <math>n</math> be <math>p_1^{e_1}p_2^{e_2}\cdots p_k^{e_k}</math>. Any divisor of <math>n</math> must be of the form <math>p_1^{f_1}p_2^{f_2} \cdots p_k^{e_k}</math> where the <math>f_i </math> are integers such that <math>0\le f_i \le e_i</math> for <math>i = 1,2,\ldots, k</math>. Thus, the number of divisors of <math>n</math> is <math>\sigma_0(n) = (e_1+1)(e_2+1)\cdots (e_k+1)</math>. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Introductory Problems ==== | ||
+ | * [[2005_AMC_10A_Problems/Problem_15 | 2005 AMC 10A Problem 15]] | ||
+ | |||
== Sum of divisors == | == Sum of divisors == | ||
− | The sum of the divisors, or <math>\sigma_1(n)</math>, is given by <center><math> \sigma_1(n) = (1 + p_1 + p_1^2 +\cdots p_1^{e_1})(1 + p_2 + p_2^2 + \cdots + p_2^{e_2}) \cdots (1 + | + | The sum of the divisors, or <math>\sigma_1(n)</math>, is given by <center><math> \sigma_1(n) = (1 + p_1 + p_1^2 +\cdots p_1^{e_1})(1 + p_2 + p_2^2 + \cdots + p_2^{e_2}) \cdots (1 + p_k + p_k^2 + \cdots + p_k^{e_k}).</math> </center> |
+ | |||
+ | There will be <math>(e_1+1)(e_2+1)(e_3+1)\cdots (e_k+1)</math> products formed by taking one number from each sum, which is the number of divisors of <math>n</math>. Clearly all possible products are divisors of <math>n</math>. Furthermore, all of those products are unique since each positive integer has a unique prime factorization. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since all of these products are added together, we can conclude this gives us the sum of the divisors. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Sum of kth Powers of Divisors == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Inspired by the example of the sum of divisors, we can easily see that the sum of the <math>k^\text{th}</math> powers of the divisors is given by | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \sigma_k(n) &= (1+p_1^k+p_1^{2k}+\cdots +p_1^{e_1k})(1+p_2^k+p_2^{2k}+\cdots +p_2^{e_2k})\cdots (1+p_i^k+p_i^{2k}+\cdots +p_i^{e_ik}) \\ | ||
+ | &= \prod_{a=1}^{i}\left(\sum_{b=0}^{e_a}p_a^{bk}\right) | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | where <math>p_1,p_2,...,p_i</math> are the distinct prime divisors of <math>n</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is proven in a very similar way to the <math>\sigma_1</math> case. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Divisibility]] | * [[Divisibility]] | ||
* [[Number theory]] | * [[Number theory]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{stub}} |
Latest revision as of 05:58, 21 May 2009
The divisor function is denoted and is defined as the sum of the th powers of the divisors of . Thus where the are the positive divisors of .
Contents
Counting divisors
Note that , the number of divisors of . Thus is simply the number of divisors of .
Example Problems
Demonstration
Consider the task of counting the divisors of 72.
- First, we find the prime factorization of 72:
- Since each divisor of 72 can have a power of 2, and since this power can be 0, 1, 2, or 3, we have 4 possibilities. Likewise, since each divisor can have a power of 3, and since this power can be 0, 1, or 2, we have 3 possibilities. By an elementary counting principle, we have divisors.
We can now generalize. Let the prime factorization of be . Any divisor of must be of the form where the are integers such that for . Thus, the number of divisors of is .
Introductory Problems
Sum of divisors
The sum of the divisors, or , is given by
There will be products formed by taking one number from each sum, which is the number of divisors of . Clearly all possible products are divisors of . Furthermore, all of those products are unique since each positive integer has a unique prime factorization.
Since all of these products are added together, we can conclude this gives us the sum of the divisors.
Sum of kth Powers of Divisors
Inspired by the example of the sum of divisors, we can easily see that the sum of the powers of the divisors is given by where are the distinct prime divisors of .
This is proven in a very similar way to the case.
See also
This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.