Difference between revisions of "1961 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{IMO box|year=1961|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | {{IMO box|year=1961|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | ||
+ | ==Solution 2 By PEKKA== | ||
+ | We firstly use the duality principle. | ||
+ | <math>a=x+y~~b=x+z~~c=y+z</math> | ||
+ | The LHS becomes <math>(x+y)^2+(x+z)^2+(y+z)^2</math> | ||
+ | and the RHS becomes <math>4\sqrt{3}\sqrt{(x+y+z)xyz}</math> If we use Heron's formula. | ||
+ | By AM-GM <math>\frac{(x+y+z)^3}{27} \ge xyz</math> | ||
+ | Making this substitution <math>[ABC]</math> becomes | ||
+ | <math>\sqrt{(x+y+z)^4\frac{1}{27}}</math> | ||
+ | and once we take the square root of the area then our RHS becomes | ||
+ | <math>\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{3\sqrt{3}}(x+y+z)^2=\frac{4}{3}(x+y+z)^2</math> | ||
+ | Multiplying the RHS and the LHS by 3 we get the LHS to be | ||
+ | <math>3((x+y)^2+(x+z)^2+(y+z)^2)=6(x^2+y^2+z^2+xy+yz+xz).</math> | ||
+ | Our RHS becomes | ||
+ | <math>4(x^2+y^2+z^2)+8(xy+yz+xz).</math> | ||
+ | Subtracting <math>4(x^2+y^2+z^2)+6(xy+yz+xz)</math> we have the LHS equal to <math>(2(x^2+y^2+z^2))</math> and the RHS being <math>2(xy+xz+yz)</math> | ||
+ | If LHS <math>\ge</math> RHS then LHS-RHS<math>\ge 0</math> | ||
+ | LHS-RHS=<math>2(x^2+y^2+z^2)-2(xy+xz+yz)=x^2-2xy+y^2+x^2-2x+z^2+y^2-2yz+z^2=(x-y)^2+(x-z)^2+(y-z)^2.</math> | ||
+ | <math>(x-y)^2+(x-z)^2+(y-z)^2 \ge 0</math> by the trivial inequality so therefore, <math>a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \ge 4S\sqrt{3}</math> and we're done. | ||
==Video Solution== | ==Video Solution== |
Revision as of 18:03, 1 August 2022
Problem
Let , , and be the lengths of a triangle whose area is S. Prove that
In what case does equality hold?
Solution
Substitute , where
This shows that the inequality is equivalent to .
This can be proven because . The equality holds when , or when the triangle is equilateral.
1961 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |
Solution 2 By PEKKA
We firstly use the duality principle. The LHS becomes and the RHS becomes If we use Heron's formula. By AM-GM Making this substitution becomes and once we take the square root of the area then our RHS becomes Multiplying the RHS and the LHS by 3 we get the LHS to be Our RHS becomes Subtracting we have the LHS equal to and the RHS being If LHS RHS then LHS-RHS LHS-RHS= by the trivial inequality so therefore, and we're done.
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYOB-KSEF3k&list=PLa8j0YHOYQQJGzkvK2Sm00zrh0aIQnof8&index=4 - AMBRIGGS