Difference between revisions of "1961 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
Mathboy100 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1 (Heron Bash + Nice Alg)) |
Mathboy100 (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 1 (Heron Bash + Nice Alg)) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
and thus | and thus | ||
<cmath>(x + y - z)^2 + (y + z - x)^2 + (z + x - y^2) = 3x^2 + 3y^2 + 3z^2 - 2xy - 2xz - 2yz.</cmath> | <cmath>(x + y - z)^2 + (y + z - x)^2 + (z + x - y^2) = 3x^2 + 3y^2 + 3z^2 - 2xy - 2xz - 2yz.</cmath> | ||
− | Applying | + | Applying this to the equation, we obtain |
<cmath>\sqrt{4AB + 4BC + 4CA - 3A^2 - 3B^2 - 3C^2 + 2AB + 2BC + 2CA}</cmath> | <cmath>\sqrt{4AB + 4BC + 4CA - 3A^2 - 3B^2 - 3C^2 + 2AB + 2BC + 2CA}</cmath> | ||
<cmath>\sqrt{6AB + 6BC + 6CA - 3A^2 - 3B^2 - 3C^2}.</cmath> | <cmath>\sqrt{6AB + 6BC + 6CA - 3A^2 - 3B^2 - 3C^2}.</cmath> |
Revision as of 22:59, 2 December 2022
Problem
Let , , and be the lengths of a triangle whose area is S. Prove that
In what case does equality hold?
Solution 1 (Heron Bash + Nice Alg)
As in the first solution, we have This can be simplified to Next, we can factor out all of the s and use a clever difference of squares: We can now use difference of squares again: We know that This is because the area of the triangle stays the same if we switch around the values of , , and .
Thus, We must prove that the RHS of this equation is less than or equal to .
Let , , . Then, our inequality is reduced to We will now simplify the RHS.
For any real numbers , , and , and thus Applying this to the equation, we obtain We now have to prove We can now simplify: Finally, we can apply AM-GM: Adding these all up, we have the desired inequality and so the proof is complete.
To have , we must satisfy This is only true when , and thus . Therefore, equality happens when the triangle is equilateral.
~mathboy100
Solution 2 By PEKKA
We firstly use the duality principle. The LHS becomes and the RHS becomes If we use Heron's formula. By AM-GM Making this substitution becomes and once we take the square root of the area then our RHS becomes Multiplying the RHS and the LHS by 3 we get the LHS to be Our RHS becomes Subtracting we have the LHS equal to and the RHS being If LHS RHS then LHS-RHS LHS-RHS= by the trivial inequality so therefore, and we're done.
1961 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYOB-KSEF3k&list=PLa8j0YHOYQQJGzkvK2Sm00zrh0aIQnof8&index=4 - AMBRIGGS