Difference between revisions of "1988 IMO Problems/Problem 6"
Countmath1 (talk | contribs) (→Solution 2 (Sort of Root Jumping)) |
Countmath1 (talk | contribs) (→Solution 2 (Sort of Root Jumping)) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
We proceed by way of contradiction. | We proceed by way of contradiction. | ||
− | WLOG, let <math>a\geq{b},</math> fix <math>b</math>, and choose the value of <math>a</math>, such that <math>a+b</math> is minimized. | + | WLOG, let <math>a\geq{b},</math> fix <math>b</math>, and choose the value of <math>a</math>, such that <math>a+b</math> is minimized. Fix <math>c</math> to be the nonsquare positive integer such that such that <math>\frac{a^2+b^2}{ab+1}=c,</math> or <math>a^2+b^2=c(ab+1).</math> Expanding and rearranging, |
<cmath>P(a)=a^2+a(-bc)+b^2-c=0.</cmath> | <cmath>P(a)=a^2+a(-bc)+b^2-c=0.</cmath> | ||
This quadratic has two roots, <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_2</math>, such that | This quadratic has two roots, <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_2</math>, such that |
Revision as of 23:08, 24 December 2022
Problem
Let and be positive integers such that divides . Show that is the square of an integer.
Solution 1
Choose integers such that Now, for fixed , out of all pairs choose the one with the lowest value of . Label . Thus, is a quadratic in . Should there be another root, , the root would satisfy: Thus, isn't a positive integer (if it were, it would contradict the minimality condition). But , so is an integer; hence, . In addition, so that . We conclude that so that .
This construction works whenever there exists a solution for a fixed , hence is always a perfect square.
Solution 2 (Sort of Root Jumping)
We proceed by way of contradiction.
WLOG, let fix , and choose the value of , such that is minimized. Fix to be the nonsquare positive integer such that such that or Expanding and rearranging, This quadratic has two roots, and , such that WLOG, let . By Vieta's, and From , is an integer, because both and are integers.
From is nonzero since is not square, from our assumption.
We can plug in for in the original expression, because yielding . If then and and because is a positive integer.
We construct the following inequalities: since is positive. Adding , contradicting the minimality of
-Benedict T (countmath1)
1988 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 5 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Last question |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |