Difference between revisions of "2001 IMO Shortlist Problems/A3"
Maths1234rc (talk | contribs) (→Solution 2) |
Maths1234rc (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<cmath> \frac{x_1}{1+x_1^2} + \frac{x_2}{1+x_1^2 + x_2^2} + \dotsb + \frac{x_n}{1+ x_1^2 + \dotsb + x_n^2} < \sqrt{n} . </cmath> | <cmath> \frac{x_1}{1+x_1^2} + \frac{x_2}{1+x_1^2 + x_2^2} + \dotsb + \frac{x_n}{1+ x_1^2 + \dotsb + x_n^2} < \sqrt{n} . </cmath> | ||
− | == Solution == | + | == Solution 1 == |
We prove the following general inequality, for arbitrary positive real <math>k</math>: | We prove the following general inequality, for arbitrary positive real <math>k</math>: | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<cmath> (\lvert \sin t \rvert + \sqrt{n} \cos t)/k \le (1 + n)^{1/2}(\sin^2 t + \cos^2 t)^{1/2}/k = \sqrt{n+1}/k, </cmath> | <cmath> (\lvert \sin t \rvert + \sqrt{n} \cos t)/k \le (1 + n)^{1/2}(\sin^2 t + \cos^2 t)^{1/2}/k = \sqrt{n+1}/k, </cmath> | ||
with equality only when <math>(\lvert \sin t \rvert, \cos t) = (1/\sqrt{n^2+1}, n/\sqrt{n^2+1}</math>. Since <math>\left\lvert n/\sqrt{n^2+1} \right\rvert < 1</math>, our equality cases never coincide, so we have the desired strict inequality for <math>n+1</math>. Thus our inequality is true by induction. The problem statement therefore follows from setting <math>k=1</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | with equality only when <math>(\lvert \sin t \rvert, \cos t) = (1/\sqrt{n^2+1}, n/\sqrt{n^2+1}</math>. Since <math>\left\lvert n/\sqrt{n^2+1} \right\rvert < 1</math>, our equality cases never coincide, so we have the desired strict inequality for <math>n+1</math>. Thus our inequality is true by induction. The problem statement therefore follows from setting <math>k=1</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
== Solution 2 == | == Solution 2 == | ||
By the [[Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality]] | By the [[Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality]] |
Revision as of 05:36, 23 October 2023
Contents
Problem
Let be arbitrary real numbers. Prove the inequality
Solution 1
We prove the following general inequality, for arbitrary positive real : with equality only when .
We proceed by induction on . For , we have trivial equality. Now, suppose our inequality holds for . Then by inductive hypothesis, If we let , then we have with equality only if . By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, with equality only when . Since , our equality cases never coincide, so we have the desired strict inequality for . Thus our inequality is true by induction. The problem statement therefore follows from setting .
Solution 2
By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality For all real numbers. Hence it is only required to prove where
for ,
For k=1
Summing these inequalities, the right-hand side yields
Hence Proved by Maths1234RC P.S. This is my first solution on AOPS.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.