Difference between revisions of "1966 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
because the numerator is <math>> 0</math> (because <math>x^2 + x + 1 > 0</math>), and the | because the numerator is <math>> 0</math> (because <math>x^2 + x + 1 > 0</math>), and the | ||
denominator is also <math>> 0</math> (because <math>\alpha < \frac{\pi}{2}</math> so | denominator is also <math>> 0</math> (because <math>\alpha < \frac{\pi}{2}</math> so | ||
− | <math>\tan \frac{\alpha}{2} < 1</math>). | + | <math>\tan \frac{\alpha}{2} < \tan \frac{\pi}{4} = 1</math>). |
It follows that <math>\tan \beta > 0</math>, so it can not be that | It follows that <math>\tan \beta > 0</math>, so it can not be that | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
This becomes | This becomes | ||
− | <math>(\sin \frac{\alpha + \beta}{2} \tan \frac{\alpha + \beta}{2}) \cdot | + | <math> \left( \sin \frac{\alpha + \beta}{2} \tan \frac{\alpha + \beta}{2} \right) |
− | \cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2} = | + | \cdot \cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2} = |
\frac{1}{2}(\sin \alpha \tan \alpha + \sin \beta \tan \beta)</math> | \frac{1}{2}(\sin \alpha \tan \alpha + \sin \beta \tan \beta)</math> | ||
We will show that the function <math>f(x) = \tan x \sin x</math> is convex on | We will show that the function <math>f(x) = \tan x \sin x</math> is convex on | ||
− | the interval <math>(0, \frac{\pi}{2})</math>. Indeed, the first derivative is | + | the interval <math> \left( 0, \frac{\pi}{2} \right)</math>. Indeed, the first |
− | <math>f'(x) = \frac{\sin x}{\cos^2 x} + \sin x</math>, and the second derivative | + | derivative is <math>f'(x) = \frac{\sin x}{\cos^2 x} + \sin x</math>, and the |
− | is <math>f''(x) = \frac{\cos^4 x - \cos ^2 x + 2}{\cos^3 x}</math>. | + | second derivative is <math>f''(x) = \frac{\cos^4 x - \cos ^2 x + 2}{\cos^3 x}</math>. |
− | We have <math>f''(x) > 0</math> on <math>(0, \frac{\pi}{2})</math> since the numerator | + | We have <math>f''(x) > 0</math> on <math> \left( 0, \frac{\pi}{2} \right)</math> since the |
− | is <math>> 0</math> because <math>Y^2 - Y + 1 >0</math>, and the denominator is <math>> 0</math> on | + | numerator is <math>> 0</math> because <math>Y^2 - Y + 1 >0</math>, and the denominator is |
− | the interval <math>(0, \frac{\pi}{2})</math>. It follows that | + | <math>> 0</math> on the interval <math> \left( 0, \frac{\pi}{2} \right)</math>. It follows |
− | <math>f(x) = \tan x \sin x</math> is convex on the interval <math>(0, \frac{\pi}{2})</math>. | + | that <math>f(x) = \tan x \sin x</math> is convex on the interval |
+ | <math> \left( 0, \frac{\pi}{2} \right)</math>. | ||
Using the convexity we have | Using the convexity we have | ||
Line 84: | Line 85: | ||
<math>\frac{1}{2}(\sin \alpha \tan \alpha + \sin \beta \tan \beta) = | <math>\frac{1}{2}(\sin \alpha \tan \alpha + \sin \beta \tan \beta) = | ||
− | (\sin \frac{\alpha + \beta}{2} \tan \frac{\alpha + \beta}{2}) \cdot | + | \left( \sin \frac{\alpha + \beta}{2} \tan \frac{\alpha + \beta}{2} \right) |
− | \cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2} \le | + | \cdot \cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2} \le |
\frac{1}{2}(\sin \alpha \tan \alpha + \sin \beta \tan \beta) \cdot | \frac{1}{2}(\sin \alpha \tan \alpha + \sin \beta \tan \beta) \cdot | ||
\cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2}</math>. | \cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2}</math>. | ||
Line 91: | Line 92: | ||
We can simplify by <math>\sin \alpha \tan \alpha + \sin \beta \tan \beta</math> | We can simplify by <math>\sin \alpha \tan \alpha + \sin \beta \tan \beta</math> | ||
because it is positive (because both <math>\alpha, \beta</math> are acute!), | because it is positive (because both <math>\alpha, \beta</math> are acute!), | ||
− | and we get <math>1 \le \cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2}</math>. This is possible | + | and we get |
− | only when <math>\cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2} = 1</math>, i.e. <math>\alpha = \beta</math>. | + | |
+ | <math>1 \le \cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2}</math>. This is possible only when | ||
+ | <math>\cos \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2} = 1</math>, i.e. <math>\alpha = \beta</math>. | ||
(Solution by pf02, September 2024) | (Solution by pf02, September 2024) |
Revision as of 02:35, 29 September 2024
Let , , and be the lengths of the sides of a triangle, and respectively, the angles opposite these sides. Prove that if
the triangle is isosceles.
Solution
We'll prove that the triangle is isosceles with . We'll prove that . Assume by way of contradiction WLOG that . First notice that as then and the identity our equation becomes: Using the identity and inserting this into the above equation we get: Now, since and the definitions of being part of the definition of a triangle, . Now, (as and the angles are positive), , and furthermore, . By all the above, Which contradicts our assumption, thus . By the symmetry of the condition, using the same arguments, . Hence .
Solution 2
First, we'll prove that both and are acute. At least one of them has to be acute because these are angles of a triangle. We can assume that is acute. We want to show that is acute as well. For a proof by contradiction, assume .
From the hypothesis, it follows that .
From it follows that . So,
because the numerator is (because ), and the denominator is also (because so ).
It follows that , so it can not be that .
Now, we will prove that implies .
Replace and (in fact, we don't care that is the radius of the circumscribed circle), and simplify by . We get
.
This becomes
We will show that the function is convex on the interval . Indeed, the first derivative is , and the second derivative is .
We have on since the numerator is because , and the denominator is on the interval . It follows that is convex on the interval .
Using the convexity we have . In our case, we have
.
We can simplify by because it is positive (because both are acute!), and we get
. This is possible only when , i.e. .
(Solution by pf02, September 2024)
See Also
1966 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |