Difference between revisions of "Holomorphic function"
m (Holomorphic moved to Holomorphic function: We're talking about holomorphic functions, right? We could have a "holomorphic function" page that redirects to this, but I think it's more logical this way.) |
(added stuff about Cauchy-Riemann equations) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | A '''holomorphic''' | + | A '''holomorphic function''' <math>f: \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}</math> is a |
+ | differentiable [[complex number|complex]] [[function]]. That is, just | ||
+ | as in the [[real number|real]] case, <math>f</math> is holomorphic at <math>z</math> if | ||
+ | <math>\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}</math> exists. This is much stronger | ||
+ | than in the real case since we must allow <math>h</math> to approach zero from | ||
+ | any direction in the [[complex plane]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Usually, we speak of functions as holomorphic on (open) sets, | ||
+ | rather than at points, for when we consider the behavior of a function | ||
+ | at a point, we prefer to consider it in the context of the points | ||
+ | nearby. | ||
== Cauchy-Riemann Equations == | == Cauchy-Riemann Equations == | ||
− | + | We can obtain an equivalent definition if we break <math>f</math> and <math>z</math> | |
− | * < | + | into real and imaginary components. |
− | * <math>\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}</math> | + | |
+ | Specifically, let <math>u, v : \mathbb{R \times R \to R}</math> be definted | ||
+ | by | ||
+ | <cmath> u(x,y) = \text{Re}\,f(x+iy), \qquad v(x,y) = \text{Im}\,f(x+iy) . </cmath> | ||
+ | If <math>z = x+iy</math>, then | ||
+ | <cmath> f(z) = u(x,y) + i v(x,y). </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | It turns out that we can express the idea "<math>f</math> is holomorphic" | ||
+ | entirely in terms of partial derivatives of <math>u</math> and <math>v</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Theorem.''' Let <math>D</math> be an open, connected subset of <math>\mathbb{C}</math>. | ||
+ | Let us abbreviate <math>x = \text{Re}\, z</math> and <math>y = \text{Im}\, z</math>. | ||
+ | Then the function <math>f</math> is holomorphic on <math>D</math> | ||
+ | if and only if all the partial derivatives of <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> with respect | ||
+ | to <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> are continuous on <math>D</math>, and the following system holds | ||
+ | for every point <math>z \in D</math>: | ||
+ | <cmath> \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} &= \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} ,\ | ||
+ | \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} &= -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}. | ||
+ | \end{align*} </cmath> | ||
+ | These equations are called the '''[[Cauchy-Riemann Equations]]'''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For convenience, we may abbreviate | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} | ||
+ | + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}, \qquad | ||
+ | \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + | ||
+ | i \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} . </cmath> | ||
+ | With this abuse of notation, we may rewrite the Cauchy-Riemann | ||
+ | equations thus: | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} . </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''Proof of theorem.'' First, suppose that <math>f</math> is | ||
+ | complex-differentiable at <math>z</math>. Then at <math>z</math>, | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+ih)-f(z)}{h} | ||
+ | &= i \cdot \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+ih) - f(z)}{ih} \ | ||
+ | &= i \cdot f'(z) \ | ||
+ | &= i \cdot \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h} | ||
+ | = i \cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} . </cmath> | ||
+ | Breaking <math>f</math> into real and imaginary components, we see | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} | ||
+ | = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} | ||
+ | = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} + i \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}. </cmath> | ||
+ | Setting real and imaginary components equal, we obtain the | ||
+ | Cauchy-Riemann equations. It follows from the | ||
+ | [[Cauchy Integral Formula]] that the second derivative of <math>f</math> exists | ||
+ | at <math>z</math>; thus the derivative of <math>f</math> is continuous at <math>z</math>, and so | ||
+ | are the partial derivatives of <math>u</math> and <math>v</math>. | ||
− | + | Now, suppose the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold a point <math>z</math>, and | |
+ | that the partial derivatives of <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> exist and are continuous | ||
+ | in a [[neighborhood]] of <math>z</math>. Let <math>h = h_1 + i h_2</math> be an arbitrarily | ||
+ | small complex number, with <math>h_1, h_2 \in \mathbb{R}</math>. Then | ||
+ | <cmath> \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \frac{f(z + h) - f(z)}{h} &= \frac{f(z+h_1+ih_2)-f(z+h_1)}{h_1+ih_2} | ||
+ | + \frac{f(z+h_1)-f(z)}{h_1+ih_2} \ | ||
+ | &\approx \frac{ih_2}{h_1+ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(z+h_1) | ||
+ | + \frac{h_1}{h_1 + ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(z) \ | ||
+ | &\approx \frac{ih_2}{h_1+ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(z) | ||
+ | + \frac{h_1}{h_1 + ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(z) , | ||
+ | \end{align*} </cmath> | ||
+ | with the first approximation from the definition of the partial derivatives | ||
+ | and the second from the continuity of the partial derivatives. | ||
+ | We may force <math>h</math> to be small enough that both approximations | ||
+ | are arbitrarily accurate. Now, by the Cauchy-Riemann equations, | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{i h_2}{h_1+ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(z) | ||
+ | + \frac{h_1}{h_1 + ih_2} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(z) | ||
+ | = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} (z) .</cmath> | ||
+ | Therefore | ||
+ | <cmath> \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} | ||
+ | (z) . </cmath> | ||
+ | In particular, the limit exists, so <math>f</math> is differentiable at <math>z</math>. | ||
+ | Since <math>z</math> was arbitrary, it follows that <math>f</math> is differentiable | ||
+ | everywhere in <math>D</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
== Analytic Functions == | == Analytic Functions == | ||
− | A related notion to that of homolorphicity is that of analyticity. A function <math>f:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}</math> is said to be '''analytic''' at <math>z</math> if <math>f</math> has a convergent [[power series]] expansion on some [[neighborhood]] of <math>z</math>. Amazingly, it turns out that a function is holomorphic at <math>z</math> if and only if it is analytic at <math>z</math>. | + | A related notion to that of homolorphicity is that of analyticity. A |
+ | function <math>f:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}</math> is said to be '''analytic''' at | ||
+ | <math>z</math> if <math>f</math> has a convergent [[power series]] expansion on some | ||
+ | [[neighborhood]] of <math>z</math>. Amazingly, it turns out that a function is | ||
+ | holomorphic at <math>z</math> if and only if it is analytic at <math>z</math>. | ||
[[Category:Complex analysis]] | [[Category:Complex analysis]] |
Revision as of 00:16, 7 April 2009
A holomorphic function is a
differentiable complex function. That is, just
as in the real case,
is holomorphic at
if
exists. This is much stronger
than in the real case since we must allow
to approach zero from
any direction in the complex plane.
Usually, we speak of functions as holomorphic on (open) sets, rather than at points, for when we consider the behavior of a function at a point, we prefer to consider it in the context of the points nearby.
Cauchy-Riemann Equations
We can obtain an equivalent definition if we break and
into real and imaginary components.
Specifically, let be definted
by
If
, then
It turns out that we can express the idea " is holomorphic"
entirely in terms of partial derivatives of
and
.
Theorem. Let be an open, connected subset of
.
Let us abbreviate
and
.
Then the function
is holomorphic on
if and only if all the partial derivatives of
and
with respect
to
and
are continuous on
, and the following system holds
for every point
:
These equations are called the Cauchy-Riemann Equations.
For convenience, we may abbreviate
With this abuse of notation, we may rewrite the Cauchy-Riemann
equations thus:
Proof of theorem. First, suppose that is
complex-differentiable at
. Then at
,
\begin{align*} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+ih)-f(z)}{h} &= i \cdot \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+ih) - f(z)}{ih} \\ &= i \cdot f'(z) \\ &= i \cdot \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h} = i \cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} . (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)
Breaking into real and imaginary components, we see
Setting real and imaginary components equal, we obtain the
Cauchy-Riemann equations. It follows from the
Cauchy Integral Formula that the second derivative of
exists
at
; thus the derivative of
is continuous at
, and so
are the partial derivatives of
and
.
Now, suppose the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold a point , and
that the partial derivatives of
and
exist and are continuous
in a neighborhood of
. Let
be an arbitrarily
small complex number, with
. Then
with the first approximation from the definition of the partial derivatives
and the second from the continuity of the partial derivatives.
We may force
to be small enough that both approximations
are arbitrarily accurate. Now, by the Cauchy-Riemann equations,
Therefore
In particular, the limit exists, so
is differentiable at
.
Since
was arbitrary, it follows that
is differentiable
everywhere in
.
Analytic Functions
A related notion to that of homolorphicity is that of analyticity. A
function is said to be analytic at
if
has a convergent power series expansion on some
neighborhood of
. Amazingly, it turns out that a function is
holomorphic at
if and only if it is analytic at
.