Difference between revisions of "Talk:Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion"
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Adeel, why don't you find the link for your Mathmatical Ideas topic PDF on this and add a link? It might prove useful to anyone beginning combinatorics. --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Mysmartmouth]] 14:35, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | Adeel, why don't you find the link for your Mathmatical Ideas topic PDF on this and add a link? It might prove useful to anyone beginning combinatorics. --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Mysmartmouth]] 14:35, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| − | 5 set example...um, wow... Btw, are you using \mid instead of just | | + | 5 set example...um, wow... Btw, are you using \mid instead of just | --[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 15:51, 2 July 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 14:51, 2 July 2006
I forgot to write Summary. I added the statement, but it doesn't look very good.
It'll look fine after someone adds some more introductory-level information (such as citing a few simpler examples first, before jumping to the semi-general result, which will be indecipherable to a young beginner). Then it will be lower on the page and the big gap won't appear. --Rrusczyk 13:25, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
Adeel, why don't you find the link for your Mathmatical Ideas topic PDF on this and add a link? It might prove useful to anyone beginning combinatorics. --Mysmartmouth 14:35, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
5 set example...um, wow... Btw, are you using \mid instead of just | --Joe 15:51, 2 July 2006 (EDT)
