Difference between revisions of "1986 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
(Created page with "== Problem == Let <math>d</math> be any positive integer not equal to <math>2, 5</math> or <math>13</math>. Show that one can find distinct <math>a,b</math> in the set <math>...") |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
We do casework with mods. | We do casework with mods. | ||
− | <math>d\equiv 0 \pmod{4}: 13d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | + | <math>d\equiv 0,3 \pmod{4}: 13d-1</math> is not a perfect square. |
<math>d\equiv 2\pmod{4}: 2d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | <math>d\equiv 2\pmod{4}: 2d-1</math> is not a perfect square. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Therefore, <math>d\equiv 1 \pmod{4}.</math> Now consider <math>d\pmod{16}.</math> | Therefore, <math>d\equiv 1 \pmod{4}.</math> Now consider <math>d\pmod{16}.</math> |
Revision as of 20:42, 29 April 2016
Problem
Let be any positive integer not equal to or . Show that one can find distinct in the set such that is not a perfect square.
Solution
We do casework with mods.
is not a perfect square.
is not a perfect square.
Therefore, Now consider
is not a perfect square.
is not a perfect square.
As we have covered all possible cases, we are done.
1986 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First Problem |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |