Difference between revisions of "1972 IMO Problems/Problem 3"
Math-shinai (talk | contribs) (→Solution 2) |
|||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Note: I am lazy, so this is only the most important part. I hope you can come up with the rest of the solution. This is my work, but perhaps someone have come up with this method before I did. | Note: I am lazy, so this is only the most important part. I hope you can come up with the rest of the solution. This is my work, but perhaps someone have come up with this method before I did. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == See Also == {{IMO box|year=1972|num-b=2|num-a=4}} |
Revision as of 14:35, 29 January 2021
Let and be arbitrary non-negative integers. Prove that is an integer. (.)
Solution 1
Let . We intend to show that is integral for all . To start, we would like to find a recurrence relation for .
First, let's look at :
Second, let's look at :
Combining,
.
Therefore, we have found the recurrence relation .
We can see that is integral because the RHS is just , which we know to be integral for all .
So, must be integral, and then must be integral, etc.
By induction, is integral for all .
Borrowed from http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~asdas/imo/imo/isoln/isoln723.html
Solution 2
Let p be a prime, and n be an integer. Let be the largest positive integer such that
WTS: For all primes ,
We know
Lemma 2.1: Let be real numbers. Then
Proof of Lemma 2.1: Let and
On the other hand,
It is trivial that (Traingle Inequality)
Apply Lemma 2.1 to the problem: and we are pretty much done.
Note: I am lazy, so this is only the most important part. I hope you can come up with the rest of the solution. This is my work, but perhaps someone have come up with this method before I did.
See Also
1972 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 4 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |