Difference between revisions of "2007 USAMO Problems/Problem 5"
(→Solution) |
m (→Solution) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Since <math>\displaystyle{a_n - 1}</math> is an odd power of <math>7</math>, <math>\displaystyle{7a_n}</math> is a perfect square. | Since <math>\displaystyle{a_n - 1}</math> is an odd power of <math>7</math>, <math>\displaystyle{7a_n}</math> is a perfect square. | ||
− | By assumption, <math>\displaystyle{a_n}</math> is divisible by <math>2n + 3</math> primes and, since the second term of the last expression above is a difference of squares and | + | By assumption, <math>\displaystyle{a_n}</math> is divisible by <math>2n + 3</math> primes and, since the second term of the last expression above is a difference of squares and thus composite, it is divisible by <math>2</math> primes. Thus <math>\displaystyle{a_{n+1}}</math> is divisible by <math>\displaystyle{(2n + 3) + 2 = 2(n+1) + 3}</math> primes as desired. |
Revision as of 21:24, 25 April 2007
Problem
Prove that for every nonnegative integer , the number is the product of at least (not necessarily distinct) primes.
Solution
2007 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
Let be . We prove the result by induction.
The result is true for because which is the product of primes. Now we assume the result hold for . We note that the sequence of is defined by the recursion
.
Since is an odd power of , is a perfect square. By assumption, is divisible by primes and, since the second term of the last expression above is a difference of squares and thus composite, it is divisible by primes. Thus is divisible by primes as desired.