Difference between revisions of "1959 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
m (→Solution 2) |
Pi is 3.14 (talk | contribs) (→Video Solution) |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
Let <math>\gcd (21n+4,14n+3)=a.</math> So for some co-prime positive integers <math>x,y</math> we have <cmath>21n+4 = ax \qquad (1)</cmath> <cmath>14n+3 = ay \qquad (2)</cmath> Multiplying <math>(1)</math> by <math>2</math> and <math>(2)</math> by <math>3</math> and then subtracting <math>(1)</math> from <math>(2)</math> we get <cmath>42n+9-(42n+8)=3ay-2ax</cmath> <cmath>\implies a(3y-2x)=1.</cmath> We must have <math>a=1</math>, since <math>a</math> is an positive integer. Thus, <math>\gcd(21n+4,14n+3)=1</math> which means the fraction is irreducible, as needed. | Let <math>\gcd (21n+4,14n+3)=a.</math> So for some co-prime positive integers <math>x,y</math> we have <cmath>21n+4 = ax \qquad (1)</cmath> <cmath>14n+3 = ay \qquad (2)</cmath> Multiplying <math>(1)</math> by <math>2</math> and <math>(2)</math> by <math>3</math> and then subtracting <math>(1)</math> from <math>(2)</math> we get <cmath>42n+9-(42n+8)=3ay-2ax</cmath> <cmath>\implies a(3y-2x)=1.</cmath> We must have <math>a=1</math>, since <math>a</math> is an positive integer. Thus, <math>\gcd(21n+4,14n+3)=1</math> which means the fraction is irreducible, as needed. | ||
− | == Video Solution == | + | == Video Solution by OmegaLearn== |
https://youtu.be/zfChnbMGLVQ?t=1266 | https://youtu.be/zfChnbMGLVQ?t=1266 | ||
Revision as of 04:12, 21 January 2023
Contents
Problem
Prove that the fraction is irreducible for every natural number
.
Solution 1
Denoting the greatest common divisor of as
, we use the Euclidean algorithm:
It follows that is irreducible. Q.E.D.
Solution 2
Assume that is a reducible fraction where
is the greatest common factor of
and
. Thus,
Subtracting the second equation from the first equation we get which is clearly absurd.
Hence is irreducible. Q.E.D.
Solution 3
Assume that is a reducible fraction.
If a certain fraction is reducible, then the fraction
is reducible, too.
In this case,
.
This fraction consists of two consecutives numbers, which never share any factor. So in this case, is irreducible, which is absurd.
Hence is irreducible. Q.E.D.
Solution 4
We notice that:
So it follows that and
must be coprime for every natural number
for the fraction to be irreducible. Now the problem simplifies to proving
irreducible. We re-write this fraction as:
Since the denominator differs from a multiple of the numerator
by 1, the numerator and the denominator must be relatively prime natural numbers. Hence it follows that
is irreducible.
Q.E.D
Solution 5
By Bezout's Lemma, , so the GCD of the numerator and denominator is
and the fraction is irreducible.
Solution 6
To understand why its irreducible, let's take a closer look at the fraction itself. If we were to separate both fractions, we end up with +
.
Simplifying the fraction, we end up with.
. Now combining these fractions with addition as shown before in the problem, we end up with
. It's important to note that 17 is 1 off from being divisible by 6, and you'll see why later down this explanation. Now we expirement with some numbers. Plugging 1 in gives us
. Notice how both numbers are one off from being divisible by 8(25 is next to 24, 17 is next to 16).
Trying 2, we end up with
. Again, both results are 1 off from being multiples of 15.
Trying 3, we end up with
. Again, both end up 1 away from being multiples of 22. This is where the realization comes in that two scenarios keep reoccurring:
1. Both Numerator and Denominator keep ending up 1 value away from being multiples of the same number, but
2. One always ends up being a prime number. Knowing that prime numbers only factors are 1 and itself, the fraction ends up being a paradoxical expression where one prime number is always being produced, and even with larger values, like say 15, implementing it in gives us , we keep ending up with results that at the end will only have a common divisor of 1.
Solution 7
Let So for some co-prime positive integers
we have
Multiplying
by
and
by
and then subtracting
from
we get
We must have
, since
is an positive integer. Thus,
which means the fraction is irreducible, as needed.
Video Solution by OmegaLearn
https://youtu.be/zfChnbMGLVQ?t=1266
~ pi_is_3.14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpUh5cLP454&list=PLa8j0YHOYQQJGzkvK2Sm00zrh0aIQnof8&index=1 - AMBRIGGS
- little fermat
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
1959 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First question |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |