Difference between revisions of "1999 AHSME Problems/Problem 28"
Isabelchen (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 2) |
Isabelchen (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 2) |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
<cmath>2a+b-c=19</cmath> | <cmath>2a+b-c=19</cmath> | ||
− | Multiplying the second equation by <math>2</math> gives <math>4a+2b-2c=38</math>. By subtracting this equation from the first equation we get <math>3c-b=61</math>. As we need to minimize the value of <math>c</math>, <math>c = 21</math>, <math> | + | Multiplying the second equation by <math>2</math> gives <math>4a+2b-2c=38</math>. By subtracting this equation from the first equation we get <math>3c-b=61</math>, <math>3c=61+b</math>. As we need to minimize the value of <math>c</math>, <math>c = 21</math>, <math>b = 2</math>, <math>a = 19</math> |
<math>x_1^3 + \cdots + x_n^3 = 8 \cdot 19 +2 - 21 = 133</math> | <math>x_1^3 + \cdots + x_n^3 = 8 \cdot 19 +2 - 21 = 133</math> |
Latest revision as of 11:25, 3 October 2023
Problem
Let be a sequence of integers such that (i) for (ii) ; and (iii) . Let and be the minimal and maximal possible values of , respectively. Then
Solution 1
Clearly, we can ignore the possibility that some are zero, as adding/removing such variables does not change the truth value of any condition, nor does it change the value of the sum of cubes. Thus we'll only consider .
Also, order of the does not matter, so we are only interested in the counts of the variables of each type. Let of the be equal to , equal to , and equal to .
The conditions (ii) and (iii) simplify to:
(ii)
(iii)
and we want to find the maximum and minimum of over all non-negative solutions of the above two equations.
Subtracting twice (ii) from (iii) we get . By entering that into one of the two equations and simplifying we get .
Thus all the solutions of our system of equations have the form .
As all three variables must be non-negative integers, we have and .
For of the form the expression we are maximizing/minimizing simplifies to . Clearly, the maximum is achieved for and the minimum for . Their values are and , and therefore .
Note
The minimum is achieved for The maximum is achieved for
Solution 2
As said in Solution 1, can be ignored, and only need to be considered.
Minimum
To minimize , there are no s and maximize the number of s.
Therefore, the number of s are , the number of s are .
Maximum
Let number of s, number of s, number of s
Multiplying the second equation by gives . By subtracting this equation from the first equation we get , . As we need to minimize the value of , , ,
Therefore, .
See also
1999 AHSME (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 27 |
Followed by Problem 29 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30 | ||
All AHSME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.