Difference between revisions of "1970 Canadian MO Problems/Problem 7"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | Let <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> be three integers with equal modularity. | + | '''Claim 1:'' 'if <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> have equal modularity, then <math>(a+b+c)</math> is divisible by <math>3</math> |
+ | |||
+ | Proof of Claim 1: Let <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> be three integers with equal modularity. | ||
That is, <math>a \equiv b\;(mod\;3)\equiv c\;(mod\;3)\equiv k\;(mod\;3)</math>, where <math>k=-1,0,</math> or <math>1</math>. | That is, <math>a \equiv b\;(mod\;3)\equiv c\;(mod\;3)\equiv k\;(mod\;3)</math>, where <math>k=-1,0,</math> or <math>1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then <math>(a+b+c)\equiv 3k\;(mod\;3)\equiv 0\;(mod\;3)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus, if <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> have equal modularity, then <math>(a+b+c)</math> is divisible by <math>3</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Claim 2:'' 'if <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> have different modularity from each other, then <math>(a+b+c)</math> is divisible by <math>3</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Proof of Claim 2: Let <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> be three integers where one of them is is divisible by 3, the other one has a reminder of 1 when divided by 3 and the other one a reminder of 2, (or -1) for simplicity. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then <math>(a+b+c)\equiv (-1+0+1)\;(mod\;3)\equiv 0\;(mod\;3)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus, if <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> have different modularity from each other, then <math>(a+b+c)</math> is divisible by <math>3</math> | ||
In order for the sum of three integers to be divisible by three these three integers should have either all with the same modularity to each other, or they must have distinct modularity. | In order for the sum of three integers to be divisible by three these three integers should have either all with the same modularity to each other, or they must have distinct modularity. | ||
+ | To have 4 integers that their sum is not divisible by three, then we can't have any combinations of 3 out of 4 where each of those are either the same modularity or different modularity with each other. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, one can chose 2 integers with the same modularity with each other and another integer with a different modularity but the same modularity with each other. | ||
+ | |||
+ | So, from integers <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, <math>c</math>, and <math>d</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>a \equiv b\;(mod\;3)\equiv k\;(mod\;3)</math>, where <math>k=-1,0,</math> or <math>1</math>. | ||
+ | and <math>c \equiv d\;(mod\;3)\equiv q\;(mod\;3)</math>, where <math>q=-1,0,</math> or <math>1</math> and <math>q \ne k</math> | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 27 November 2023
Problem
Show that from any five integers, not necessarily distinct, one can always choose three of these integers whose sum is divisible by .
Solution
'Claim 1: 'if ,
, and
have equal modularity, then
is divisible by
Proof of Claim 1: Let ,
, and
be three integers with equal modularity.
That is, , where
or
.
Then
Thus, if ,
, and
have equal modularity, then
is divisible by
'Claim 2: 'if ,
, and
have different modularity from each other, then
is divisible by
Proof of Claim 2: Let ,
, and
be three integers where one of them is is divisible by 3, the other one has a reminder of 1 when divided by 3 and the other one a reminder of 2, (or -1) for simplicity.
Then
Thus, if ,
, and
have different modularity from each other, then
is divisible by
In order for the sum of three integers to be divisible by three these three integers should have either all with the same modularity to each other, or they must have distinct modularity.
To have 4 integers that their sum is not divisible by three, then we can't have any combinations of 3 out of 4 where each of those are either the same modularity or different modularity with each other.
Therefore, one can chose 2 integers with the same modularity with each other and another integer with a different modularity but the same modularity with each other.
So, from integers ,
,
, and
Let , where
or
.
and , where
or
and
~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.