Difference between revisions of "Liouville's Theorem (complex analysis)"
m (There is no "-" there. Check differentiation of 1/(1-x). It equals to -(1-x)^{-2}*d(1-x)/dx and then (1-x)^{-2}. The minuses cancel each other out.) |
m (does not add up, one R gets canceled there, in other proofs and in parametric form of the contour it also ends up with M/R and not M/R^2) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
counterclockwise circle of radius <math>R</math> centered at <math>z_0</math>. Then | counterclockwise circle of radius <math>R</math> centered at <math>z_0</math>. Then | ||
<cmath> \lvert f'(z_0) \rvert = \biggl\lvert \frac{1}{2\pi i} | <cmath> \lvert f'(z_0) \rvert = \biggl\lvert \frac{1}{2\pi i} | ||
− | \int_C \frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^2}dz \biggr\rvert \le \frac{M}{R | + | \int_C \frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^2}dz \biggr\rvert \le \frac{M}{R} .</cmath> |
Since <math>f</math> is holomorphic on the entire complex plane, <math>R</math> can | Since <math>f</math> is holomorphic on the entire complex plane, <math>R</math> can | ||
be arbitrarily large. It follows that <math>f'(z) = 0</math>, for every | be arbitrarily large. It follows that <math>f'(z) = 0</math>, for every |
Latest revision as of 19:30, 16 January 2024
In complex analysis, Liouville's Theorem states that a bounded holomorphic function on the entire complex plane must be constant. It is named after Joseph Liouville. Picard's Little Theorem is a stronger result.
Contents
Statement
Let be a holomorphic function. Suppose there exists some real number such that for all . Then is a constant function.
Proof
We use Cauchy's Integral Formula.
Pick some ; let denote the simple counterclockwise circle of radius centered at . Then Since is holomorphic on the entire complex plane, can be arbitrarily large. It follows that , for every point . Now for any two complex numbers and , so is constant, as desired.
Extensions
It follows from Liouville's theorem if is a non-constant entire function, then the image of is dense in ; that is, for every , there exists some that is arbitrarily close to .
Proof
Suppose on the other hand that there is some not in the image of , and that there is a positive real such that has no point within of . Then the function is holomorphic on the entire complex plane, and it is bounded by . It is therefore constant. Therefore is constant.
Picard's Little Theorem offers the stronger result that if avoids two points in the plane, then it is constant. It is possible for an entire function to avoid a single point, as avoids 0.