Difference between revisions of "2008 USAMO Problems/Problem 4"
I like pie (talk | contribs) (Fixed link) |
(will finish soon) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Problem == | == Problem == | ||
− | (''Gregory Galparin'') Let <math>\mathcal{P}</math> be a convex polygon with <math>n</math> sides, <math>n\ge3</math>. Any set of <math>n - 3</math> diagonals of <math>\mathcal{P}</math> that do not intersect in the interior of the polygon determine a | + | (''Gregory Galparin'') Let <math>\mathcal{P}</math> be a convex polygon with <math>n</math> sides, <math>n\ge3</math>. Any set of <math>n - 3</math> diagonals of <math>\mathcal{P}</math> that do not intersect in the interior of the polygon determine a ''triangulation'' of <math>\mathcal{P}</math> into <math>n - 2</math> triangles. If <math>\mathcal{P}</math> is regular and there is a triangulation of <math>\mathcal{P}</math> consisting of only isosceles triangles, find all the possible values of <math>n</math>. |
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | === | + | We label the vertices of <math>\mathcal{P}</math> as <math>P_0, P_1, P_2, \ldots, P_n</math>. Consider a diagonal <math>d = \overline{P_a,P_{a+k}},\,k \le n/2</math> in the triangulation. This diagonal partitions <math>\mathcal{P}</math> into two regions <math>\mathcal{Q},\, \mathcal{R}</math>, and is the side of an isosceles triangle in both regions. [[Without loss of generality]] suppose the area of <math>Q</math> is less than the area of <math>R</math> (so the [[circumcenter|center]] of <math>P</math> does not lie in the interior of <math>Q</math>); it follows that the lengths of the edges and diagonals in <math>Q</math> are smaller than <math>d</math>. Thus <math>d</math> must the be the base of the isosceles triangle in <math>Q</math>, from which it follows that the isosceles triangle is <math>\triangle P_aP_{a+k/2}P_{a+k}</math>, and so <math>2|k</math>. Repeating this process on the legs of isosceles triangle (<math>\overline{P_aP_{a+k/2}},\,\overline{P_{a+k}P_{a+k/2}}</math>), it follows that <math>k = 2^m</math> for some positive integer <math>m</math>. |
− | = | + | |
+ | Now take the isosceles triangle <math>P_xP_yP_z</math> in the triangulation that contains the center of <math>\mathcal{P}</math> in its interior; if a diagonal passes through the center, selecting either of the isosceles triangles with that diagonal is an edge will suffice. Without loss of generality, suppose <math>P_xP_y = P_yP_z</math>. From our previous result, it follows that (sum of powers of <math>2</math>), eg | ||
+ | <cmath>n = 2^{a+1} + 2^{b}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We now claim that this condition is sufficient. Suppose WLOG that <math>a+1 \ge b</math>; then we rewrite this as | ||
+ | <cmath>n = 2^{b}(2^{a-b+1}+1).</cmath> | ||
+ | *''Lemma 1'': All <math>n = 2^k + 1</math> and <math>n=4</math> have triangulations that work. | ||
+ | *''Lemma 2'': If <math>n</math>-sided polygon works, then <math>2n</math>-sided polygon works. | ||
+ | By induction, it follows that we can cover all the <math>n</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''Proof 1'': For <math>n = 3,4</math>, this is trivial. For <math>k>1</math>, construct <math>P_0P_{2^k}</math> and <math>P_{2^k+1}P_O</math>, then make midpoint isosceles triangles, repeat. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ''Proof 2'': Construct every other edge, then reduce etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{incomplete|solution}} | ||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} |
Revision as of 17:19, 2 May 2008
Problem
(Gregory Galparin) Let be a convex polygon with sides, . Any set of diagonals of that do not intersect in the interior of the polygon determine a triangulation of into triangles. If is regular and there is a triangulation of consisting of only isosceles triangles, find all the possible values of .
Contents
Solution
We label the vertices of as . Consider a diagonal in the triangulation. This diagonal partitions into two regions , and is the side of an isosceles triangle in both regions. Without loss of generality suppose the area of is less than the area of (so the center of does not lie in the interior of ); it follows that the lengths of the edges and diagonals in are smaller than . Thus must the be the base of the isosceles triangle in , from which it follows that the isosceles triangle is , and so . Repeating this process on the legs of isosceles triangle (), it follows that for some positive integer .
Now take the isosceles triangle in the triangulation that contains the center of in its interior; if a diagonal passes through the center, selecting either of the isosceles triangles with that diagonal is an edge will suffice. Without loss of generality, suppose . From our previous result, it follows that (sum of powers of ), eg
We now claim that this condition is sufficient. Suppose WLOG that ; then we rewrite this as
- Lemma 1: All and have triangulations that work.
- Lemma 2: If -sided polygon works, then -sided polygon works.
By induction, it follows that we can cover all the .
Proof 1: For , this is trivial. For , construct and , then make midpoint isosceles triangles, repeat.
Proof 2: Construct every other edge, then reduce etc.
Template:Incomplete
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
Resources
2008 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
- <url>viewtopic.php?t=202905 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url>