Difference between revisions of "2007 USAMO Problems/Problem 1"

Revision as of 11:37, 7 June 2014

Problem

Let $n$ be a positive integer. Define a sequence by setting $a_1 = n$ and, for each $k>1$ , letting $a_k$ be the unique integer in the range $0 \le a_k \le k-1$ for which $a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_k$ is divisible by $k$ . For instance, when $n=9$ the obtained sequence is $9, 1, 2, 0, 3, 3, 3, \ldots$ . Prove that for any $n$ the sequence $a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots$ eventually becomes constant.

Solution

Solution 1

Let $S_k = a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_k$ and $b_k = \frac{S_k}{k}$ . Thus, because $S_{k+1} = S_k + a_{k+1}$ ,

$b_{k+1} = \frac{b_k \cdot k + a_{k+1}}{k+1} = \left(\frac{k}{k+1}\right) \cdot b_k + \frac{a_{k+1}}{k+1}$

$\frac{k}{k+1} < 1$ , and by definition, $\frac{a_{k+1}}{k+1} < 1$ . Thus, $b_{k+1} < b_k + 1$ . Also, both $b_k,\ b_{k+1}$ are integers, so $b_{k+1} \le b_k$ . As the $b_k$ s form a non-increasing sequence of positive integers, they must eventually become constant.

Therefore, $b_k = b_{k+1}$ for some sufficiently large value of $k$ . Then $a_{k+1} = s_{k+1} - s_k = b_k(k + 1) - b_k(k) = b_k$ , so eventually the sequence $a_k$ becomes constant.

Solution 2

Let $a_1=n$ . Since $a_k\le k-1$ , we have that $a_1+a_2+a_3+\hdots+a_n\le n+1+2+\hdots+n-1$ .

Thus, $a_1+a_2+\hdots+a_n\le \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ .

Since $a_1+a_2+\hdots+a_n=nk$ , for some integer $k$ , we can keep adding $k$ to satisfy the conditions, provided that $k\le n$ because $a_n+1\le n$ .

Because $k\le \frac{n+1}{2}\le n$ , the sequence must eventually become constant.

Solution 3

Define $S_k = a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_k$ , and $b_k = \frac{S_k}{k}$ . By the problem hypothesis, $b_k$ is an integer valued sequence.

Lemma: The exists a $k$ such that $b_k < k$ .

Proof: Choose any $k$ such that $k^2 + 3k - 2 > 2n$ . Then: $\frac{k^2 + 3k - 2}{2} > n$ $k^2 > \frac{k^2 - 3k + 2}{2} + n$ $k^2 > (k-2) + (k-1) + ... + 1 + n$ $k^2 > a_{k-1} + a_{k-2} + ... + a_2 + a_1$ $k^2 > S_k$ $k > \frac{S_k}{k}$ $k > b_k,$ as desired.

Let k be the smallest k such that $b_k < k$ . Then $b_k = m < k$ , and $S_k = km$ . To make $b_{k+1}$ an integer, $S_{k+1} = S_k + a_{k+1}$ must be divisible by $k+1$ . Thus, because $km + m$ is divisible by $k+1$ , $a_{k+1} \equiv m \mod (k+1)$ , and, because $0 \le a_{k+1} < k$ , $a_{k+1} = m$ . Then $b_{k+1} = \frac{(k+1)m}{k+1} = m$ as well. Repeating the same process using $k+1$ instead of $k$ gives $a_{k+2} = m$ , and an easy induction can prove that for all $N > k+1$ , $a_N = m$ . Thus, $a_k$ becomes a constant function for arbitrarily large values of k.

Note: This solution is a formalization of the second solution. Also, the lemma could have been simplified if I chose k = n, which is exactly the second solution's thought process.

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 Let k be the smallest k such that <math>b_k < k</math>. Then <math>b_k = m < k</math>, and <math>S_k = km</math>. To make <math>b_{k+1}</math> an integer, <math>S_{k+1} = S_k + a_{k+1}</math> must be divisible by <math>k+1</math>. Thus, because <math>km + m</math> is divisible by <math>k+1</math>, <math>a_{k+1} \equiv m \mod (k+1)</math>, and, because <math>0 \le a_{k+1} < k</math>, <math>a_{k+1} = m</math>. Then <math>b_{k+1} = \frac{(k+1)m}{k+1} = m</math> as well. Repeating the same process using <math>k+1</math> instead of <math>k</math> gives <math>a_{k+2} = m</math>, and an easy induction can prove that for all <math>N > k+1</math>, <math>a_N = m</math>. Thus, <math>a_k</math> becomes a constant function for arbitrarily large values of k.
+''Note: This solution is a formalization of the second solution. Also, the lemma could have been simplified if I chose k = n, which is exactly the second solution's thought process.''
 == See also ==

2007 USAMO (Problems • Resources)
Preceded by First question	Followed by Problem 2
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6
All USAMO Problems and Solutions

Page

Toolbox

Search